2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)

I doubt it is but even you have to admit that it creates an undue burden given the insufficient time to educate voters, especially young voters. All these laws wouldn't be as much of an issue if Republicans hadn't enacted/tightened these laws so close to the election. It's quite obvious to any rational person what Republicans care about most is helping Romney win and not helping voters vote or protecting the sanctity voting.I haven't done any research to know when the voter ID laws were put in place, but with the time our legislative/legal system take to work things through it would impact an election at some point. Like to PA injunction for this election, I wouldn't have a problem holding off on the NH law until after this election.

Turzai comment = agree, dumbass.

Mitt come out swinging hard

Haha wow. You aren't "that naive" but naive enough to use your own generalizations and paranoia, which again there are no facts to substantiate, to come to conclusions? Brilliant. Curse and use talking points when quantitative facts are presented.

My point, from my previous post, is proven.

You haven't proven anything other than that you can post links.

Mitt come out swinging hardIt all starts with the power tie. I expected a royal blue or light blue from Romney.....glad to see the power tie and Romney swinging. Win or lose, go down making your case forcefully to the American people.

These facts are too real to counter? Come on folks, give me some legit retorts.The too poor or no access to get to DMV....c'mon man. Anyone who wants to vote and is truly in that situation could simply call the local Dem or GOP office and someone would make a beeline to help them register.

ACORN voter fraud was documented and extensive.

More Acorn Voter Fraud Comes to Light - WSJ.com (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124182750646102435.html)

Other examples:

Victims of Voter Fraud: Poor and Disadvantaged are Most Likely to Have Their Vote Stolen (http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA635.html)

Voter fraud certainly does exist.

Most entertaining debate I can remember . I bet Obama and Romney are going out drinking together after the debate :)

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/545688_536055979754043_2129392834_n.jpg

Nobody's talking about the debate yet?

To me, Obama fell flat tonight. So much so it was almost a little painful for me. I'm hoping he'll go in for the kill next debate because boy, was that rough.

Nobody's talking about the debate yet?

To me, Obama fell flat tonight. So much so it was almost a little painful for me. I'm hoping he'll go in for the kill next debate because boy, was that rough.As far as facts go, they were both full of it, as usual. Just on pure style I was expecting Obama to win easily, and early on it he was winning. But it didn't last long, and Romney won most of the debate and going away.

I'm trying to be balanced on the substance, below. It helps that on most things like Obamacare vs. Romneycare, neither side is particularly appealing.

Obama should quit trying to strawman Romney on imaginary positions, and keep hammering him on the principles that Romney actually shares with W. Bush which he did. And point out more clearly the economy has improved over time on his watch, even if he hasn't had the dramatic recovery that Clinton and Reagan could point to when they ran for re-election.

Romney should quit saying he's going to repeal whole programs of Obama's then say only change parts of them, and hammer Obama on the lack of recovery in four years, which he did. And point out clearly his success in his previous office and his own plans, which he did in as much detail as other presidential candidates including Senator Obama has done.

I don't expect every debate to be like this, but if they were, Romney would win the election handily.

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc6/247725_10151237367830990_851294382_n.jpg