The "we should have takens"

I don't follow the stuff leading up to the draft closely, but every year, we take propsects people aren't familiar with and some fans respond in a burst of passion about we should have taken player X with the pick instead.

Now, I am a bit curious about these Players Xs that we should have taken and whether we should have taken the Player Xs over the players we actually took.

Now, I can recall Kerrigan(Cameron Jordan?) and Trent(Okung) getting that treatment for sure, but my memory is shaky on the other players, so I could use some help about this here.

They drafted the players they wanted and the players who were available that they thought would help this team, so I don't understand the point of this thread.

Could'of, would'of, should'of...is pointless. Let's focus on what we have and put this thing together.

Markelle Martin

Brandon Boykin

Nate Potter

David Molk

Massie

Polk

Gannaway

Rainey

Joe Adams

replace 3 of these guys with

Kirk Cousins

The Iowa CB

The SMU CB

The SMU Guard and/or The Florida Atlantic RB

We should have taken cousins in the third. But we were patient and got him in the 4th. Way to go skins!

So basically this thread is a repeat of what was said many times over in the draft thread. Check.

Gotta love the armchair GM/Scouts.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 using Taptalk 2

[insert any "name" parroted by any draft analyst or beat writer]

We should have taken cousins in the third. But we were patient and got him in the 4th. Way to go skins!

:doh:

the cop puncher

:doh:

I'm only mocking people upset about the pick. I effing love it. Behind Griffen, it's the best pick we've made in years

We could have had Ray Rice a few years ago too.