scowan
04-27-2012, 10:45 AM
So now there are #10 Griffin III jerseys all over the Redskins.com website. What is Gaffney's new number! LOL
Jabar Gaffney Told to Seek A Tradescowan 04-27-2012, 10:45 AM So now there are #10 Griffin III jerseys all over the Redskins.com website. What is Gaffney's new number! LOL Monkeydad 04-27-2012, 10:50 AM He could still wear #10. It will just be in different colors. Other numbers he has worn: http://trialx.com/curetalk/wp-content/blogs.dir/7/files/2011/07/sports/Jabar_Gaffney-1.jpg http://trialx.com/curetalk/wp-content/blogs.dir/7/files/2011/07/sports/Jabar_Gaffney-3.jpg scowan 04-27-2012, 10:54 AM Nice football card pics Monkeydad. Yeah, its just funny to me how the $$$$ wagon got on track quick for the Redskins. "Ok so Griffin's number will sell jerseys, Gaffney, sorry bud, new number for you." Monkeydad 04-27-2012, 10:56 AM I did not even remember he was on those teams...had to look hard for those actually. Every other team he's been on has been in #10...U of Florida, Denver, New England, us. Griffin has the money to buy it from Gaffe anyway, but in reality, when the franchise QB/savior wants a number, the 4th-string WR gets the boot. scowan 04-27-2012, 11:53 AM Gaffney is not even under contract, correct? I mean is he technical still on the team? I know online internet rosters haven't been updated much since the end of the season, so you can't go by any of those. los panda 04-27-2012, 11:55 AM Gaffney is not even under contract, correct? I mean is he technical still on the team? I know online internet rosters haven't been updated much since the end of the season, so you can't go by any of those.that is true, he is waiting to be reelected by the fans, he just needs majority. contracts can void themselves if not properly maintained, it looks like that may have happened in this case Monkeydad 04-27-2012, 11:56 AM We'll probably end up cutting him to save a little cap room. Moss would save us more, but I'd rather keep Moss. I don't believe Gaffney is a FA this year. Still under contract. Monkeydad 04-27-2012, 11:58 AM that is true, he is waiting to be reelected by the fans, he just needs majority. contracts can void themselves if not properly maintained, it looks like that may have happened in this case What? los panda 04-27-2012, 12:05 PM why would a trade be mentioned if he wasn't under contract? SmootSmack 04-27-2012, 12:36 PM We'll probably end up cutting him to save a little cap room. Moss would save us more, but I'd rather keep Moss. I don't believe Gaffney is a FA this year. Still under contract. As I understand, cutting Moss save us about $1.5 million whereas cutting Gaffney would be around $2.5 million. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum