Griffin's Impact on our Offense

10, 1, 11,


All look good to me.

http://chriswalder26.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/robert-griffin-redskins-lombardi-e1331350723573.jpg
http://www.thehogs.net/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/RGIII.jpghttps://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/430325_10150608313929132_693729131_9347070_4291813 5_n.jpg

^ Very nice monkeydad


I'd like to see him wearing 2,3, 6, 12, 13 now. I'm pretty sure I'm set on him wearing 10, unless he wants to be different and wear 11 as my second choice.

I'm pretty certain RG3 will wear #10 if it's available. With rumors of a trade involving Gaffney, that number could be available.

I'm pretty certain RG3 will wear #10 if it's available. With rumors of a trade involving Gaffney, that number could be available.

Perhaps that was a condition of drafting RG3 lol

Perhaps that was a condition of drafting RG3 lol

I hope the Redskins front office aren't considering trading Gaffney because of some unprofessional twitter argument that he had with Lito Sheppard. From an organizational standpoint, is that regarded as unprofessional? I don't think so. It's not like he punched Mike Shanahan in the face during practice. Antonio Bryant hit Parcells and managed to remain with the Cowboys.

If they just feel Gaffney is trade bait regardless of the situation, then that's fine. But to trade him away for some non football related issue is ridiculous.

I highly doubt it's just because of Twitter beef.

I hope the Redskins front office aren't considering trading Gaffney because of some unprofessional twitter argument that he had with Lito Sheppard. From an organizational standpoint, is that regarded as unprofessional? I don't think so. It's not like he punched Mike Shanahan in the face during practice. Antonio Bryant hit Parcells and managed to remain with the Cowboys.

If they just feel Gaffney is trade bait regardless of the situation, then that's fine. But to trade him away for some non football related issue is ridiculous.

Select loyal readers of this site know the Redskins decided over a month ago that they were ready to move on from Gaffney

I highly doubt it's just because of Twitter beef.

What about roast beef?

Select loyal readers of this site know the Redskins decided over a month ago that they were ready to move on from Gaffney

What's the FO thinking behind it SS? I've read/heard the arguments Gaffney has no place in the line-up w/ Garcon, Morgan, Hankerson, Moss etc all on the roster. But the other side of it is Hank and Morgan are big ? because of their injuries and Garcon isn't much better statistically than Gaffney, except Gaffney knows our system already. Was there a conflict w/ Gaffney?

What's the FO thinking behind it SS? I've read/heard the arguments Gaffney has no place in the line-up w/ Garcon, Morgan, Hankerson, Moss etc all on the roster. But the other side of it is Hank and Morgan are big ? because of their injuries and Garcon isn't much better statistically than Gaffney, except Gaffney knows our system already. Was there a conflict w/ Gaffney?

Part of it is they don't feel he has much upside and is kind of dime a dozen, he's not going to do much more than catch the ball. Which is fine and all, but is it enough?

Another part of it, supposedly, is that they also think he sulked and half-assed his routes a few times last year. I can't confirm nor particularly recollect any occasional moments when this happened.

I have been hearing that they really do want to give Austin another chance and give Paul/Robinson more of a shot and they blame Keenan more for their lack of development than the players themselves

The first part of it though is mainly the biggest reason