Giantone
03-22-2012, 05:49 AM
I havent read everything there is on this but imo giving an incentive to take a player out doesnt mean encouraging your players to play dirty.
Imo it means encouraging hard hits within the rules.
$1500 for a "knockout"
$1000 to be "carried off "
I can remove a player from the play by doing my job on the field ....that does'nt mean injury,maiming,or disabling another player.
BabyLuku
03-22-2012, 06:22 AM
I don't agree with the suspension of payton or the picks but definitely the suspension of Williams.
NFL players should be passionate enough about the game that they try as hard as they possibly can on every play.
Money to injure a targeted player seems like it would just make the player lose track of all their other assignments, and what's best for the team on the play.
REDSKINS4ever
03-22-2012, 07:10 AM
I think even though Gregg Williams history goes back to Buffalo and Washington, too many years had gone by and Roger Goddell's judgment was to try the newest case at hand. Then there were former Redskins who had denied it so with Williams four/five years removed from Washington, there was no need to investigate the Redskins. But the Saints could be investigated. Goddell said this had been going on since 2010 and was able to gain significant information and they took action. But only New Orleans coaches and players will be punished. Sean Payton should have stopped it.
CrustyRedskin
03-22-2012, 08:23 AM
I wonder what Pete Rozzell would have done. Godells position is worse than a school board, 7 people making decisions on education that have no prior back ground in education. I wonder if Godell was in the band and got his ass beat every day at school.
irish
03-22-2012, 08:46 AM
I think even though Gregg Williams history goes back to Buffalo and Washington, too many years had gone by and Roger Goddell's judgment was to try the newest case at hand. Then there were former Redskins who had denied it so with Williams four/five years removed from Washington, there was no need to investigate the Redskins. But the Saints could be investigated. Goddell said this had been going on since 2010 and was able to gain significant information and they took action. But only New Orleans coaches and players will be punished. Sean Payton should have stopped it.
There were also Skins who said it happened so there was a reason to investigate the Skins. The amount of years ago has nothing to do with why the Skins were let off the hook because if the NFL wanted to investigate they would. The NFL wants this to appear to be an isolated incident that they can package up nice & neat and be done with it. This is very similar to the Skins cap-gate. Sure everyone did similar but the Skins & Boys did it a bit more so the NFL makes an example of them as unique, packages up the punishemnt nice & neat and its over.
skinsfan69
03-22-2012, 09:19 AM
...thats a joke!
If the Giants did this you'd be on my side!
Evilgrin
03-22-2012, 09:20 AM
Crap decision because way to many other teams do it, and it's been going on in the NFL forever. Goodell is a moron, get rid of him.
CRedskinsRule
03-22-2012, 09:37 AM
Crap decision because way to many other teams do it, and it's been going on in the NFL forever. Goodell is a moron, get rid of him.
So a lot of other teams break rules, lie to the league about it, then deny any wrong doing, then admit it and say they will stop, then keep doing it, then lie to the league again over a 3 year period. Wow, it's amazing that the NFL can even function if that's the case.
Put it this way, I could see Vinny doing this easily, but I would put forward that if the NFL had told Joe Gibbs this needed to stop, he would have stopped it the first time, and not lied about it and covered it up.
SmootSmack
03-22-2012, 09:42 AM
My faith in humanity is getting destroyed by some of the comments in this thread
FRPLG
03-22-2012, 09:58 AM
My faith in humanity is getting destroyed by some of the comments in this thread
No kidding.