I agree, but the hype-meter has gone through the roof since Griffin's pro day yesterday. I always wonder if something like that may sway a GM on the fence.
I think hype-meters are mostly for the fans.
skinsfaninok
03-22-2012, 07:40 PM
If Griff has a year like cam did we will al be happy every Sunday
tmandoug1
03-22-2012, 07:40 PM
To be honest they both looked great. We can't lose I'm satisfied with either.
I agree, they both looked great, I liked the fact that Luck did his outdoors, you know Skins outdoors Colts indoors.
Dirtbag59
03-22-2012, 08:46 PM
Luck's attractiveness is a step below RGIII's.
Griffin woul be fine if he cut the dreads. Luck should just be happy he's a tall star QB
GTripp0012
03-22-2012, 08:46 PM
For those that have seen both, what is your sense? Is there a clear and immediate winner? Given yesterdays performance, do you think the colts will select RG3 over Luck?Luck throws on the move a lot better than Griffin does. Something struck me as negative about the way Griffin was selling his play fakes from under center. I'm probably overanalyzing something that was very foreign to him, but Griffin likes to set his feet before releasing the ball, and that's going to be interesting in the zone/stretch/boot game. I think Luck profiles better as the play action quarterback.
Griffin sells play action really well from the gun though, so if the Redskins want to incoporate shotgun running into their offense this year, Griffin gives them an excellent centerpiece to build that around.
From the pocket, it was tough to make a comparison. Griffin can absolutely drive the ball downfield. Luck threw it really, really well downfield in the conditions, but it wasn't as impressive as Griffin, maybe just because Griffin was throwing indoors.
The ball jumps off of Griffin's hand. You can see even just by looking at his delivery that he drives the football pretty effortlessly. Luck doesn't ever look like hes throwing hard, but he has an absolute gun in the intermediate game. Hard to say if that translates to the deep passing game, where he displayed impressive distance, but the ball kept hanging on him in the wind.
Overall, I thought Luck was more impressive at his pro day, but that could just be an effect of the way each workout was scripted. Griffin wanted to show that he could do 90% under center stuff, and that's just not all that exciting. The opinion that teaching a shotgun passer footwork is difficult is so very 2003. Luck showed a lot more because he entered with fewer doubters, IMO.
TheMalcolmConnection
03-22-2012, 08:49 PM
Griffin woul be fine if he cut the dreads. Luck should just be happy he's a tall star QB
This cracks me up that we all talk about how attractive each is.
Tony freakin' Romo is tapping models and actresses... It's obvious it doesn't matter what you look like.
NYCskinfan82
03-22-2012, 08:59 PM
This cracks me up that we all talk about how attractive each is.
Tony freakin' Romo is tapping models and actresses... It's obvious it doesn't matter what you look like.
Well said.
This cracks me up that we all talk about how attractive each is.
Tony freakin' Romo is tapping models and actresses... It's obvious it doesn't matter what you look like.
So true... they've got money, fame, and women. And they play football for a freaking living. Something we'd all die to be able to do.
Meanwhile us internet geeks are taking shots at their looks, hilarious.
diehardskin2982
03-22-2012, 09:06 PM
I watched both and felt RGIII did better. He showed his quick feet, made the accurate passes and he played thriller in the background. Luck had a simulated rush but everyone knows what RGIII can do under pressure. I feel that RGIII's performance was scripted for the Redskins.
NYCskinfan82
03-22-2012, 09:21 PM
I agree, they both looked great, I liked the fact that Luck did his outdoors, you know Skins outdoors Colts indoors.
RG3 did his indoors because he heard about our NEW practice bubble. LOL:)