SmootSmack
04-03-2012, 10:29 AM
The article is inconsistent. The caption under the picture gives the reader the impression those are the uniforms, the actual article does say that it's possibly fake.
2012 NFL Uniform Thread - Nike takes overPages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
[12]
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
SmootSmack 04-03-2012, 10:29 AM The article is inconsistent. The caption under the picture gives the reader the impression those are the uniforms, the actual article does say that it's possibly fake. jdlea 04-03-2012, 10:33 AM Brian Orakpo (https://twitter.com/#!/rak98) At the Nike NFL Launch Event the New Redskins uniform is sweet!!! Will have a pic for I guys later today! This is a tweet by Brian Orakpo from earlier today. MTK 04-03-2012, 10:34 AM We'll know soon enough No major changes expected to Redskins uniforms - Rich Tandler's Real Redskins (http://www.realredskins.com/rich-tandlers-real-redsk/2012/04/no-major-changes-expected-to-redskins-uniforms.html) BigHairedAristocrat 04-03-2012, 10:34 AM I guess your right. We shouldn't listen to the Bleacher Report... I mean I guess they do just make stuff up. Breaking Down How Robert Griffin III Fits in the Redskins Offense | Bleacher Report (http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1122100-breaking-down-how-robert-griffin-iii-fits-in-the-redskins-offense) You miss the point. Bleacherreport is nothing but OPINIONS AND SPECULATION. There is no REPORTING on the site, as no on there has SOURCES. The bleacher report is often deliberately misleading and they post wild rumors as fact to increase site hits to get advertising revenue. mbedner3420 04-03-2012, 10:40 AM If I remember correctly, Larry Michael had already seen the new uniforms and mentioned that there wouldn't be any significant changes. MTK 04-03-2012, 10:43 AM You miss the point. Bleacherreport is nothing but OPINIONS AND SPECULATION. There is no REPORTING on the site, as no on there has SOURCES. The bleacher report is often deliberately misleading and they post wild rumors as fact to increase site hits to get advertising revenue. I'm not a big fan of BR either, but's only fair to point out that they have changed up their business model: From Wiki Although the network still announces the goal of providing an "empowering opportunity for every contributor hoping to establish his or her voice" in the sports blogosphere, [29] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleacher_Report#cite_note-28) Bleacher Report addressed the concerns of its critics by making substantive reforms to its editorial and personnel policies in 2010. These reforms were aimed chiefly at the mechanics of B/R's Writer Program, with an emphasis on enhancing quality and credibility by… Initiating a formal application process for all prospective writers, wherein only the top 20 percent of candidates earn the right to publish on the site[30] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleacher_Report#cite_note-29)[31] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleacher_Report#cite_note-30) Introducing comprehensive educational resources for new and veteran writers, including the "B/R U" new-media training program[32] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleacher_Report#cite_note-31) Establishing a paid team of high-profile Lead Writers to headline the network's sport-specific writer communities[33] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleacher_Report#cite_note-32) These reforms, along with the continued growth of B/R's audience, prompted Forbes.com to single out Bleacher Report as a company "doing it right" in August 2011.[34] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleacher_Report#cite_note-33) B/R was also named one of Time magazine's "50 Best Websites of 2011,"[35] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleacher_Report#cite_note-34) and was picked by Adweek readers as 2011's "Best Sports Media Brand."[36] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleacher_Report#cite_note-35) SmootSmack 04-03-2012, 10:46 AM Yeah, I mean BR is a major competitor and they certainly do a lot of questionable things. But they have some serious guys running things now and they're taking strides to move in the right direction. They still have some pretty crappy writers (some who are members of this board), and some pretty strong ones as well (again, some who are members of this board) SBXVII 04-03-2012, 11:08 AM You miss the point. Bleacherreport is nothing but OPINIONS AND SPECULATION. There is no REPORTING on the site, as no on there has SOURCES. The bleacher report is often deliberately misleading and they post wild rumors as fact to increase site hits to get advertising revenue. Yep, I missed the point, just like you. SBXVII 04-03-2012, 11:40 AM Just bringing the old thread here that had some uni designs in it... http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-locker-room/46455-2012-uniform-changes-thread.html http://myimages.bravenet.com/132/905/335/4/NRedUniConceptxcopy.png http://cbswashington.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/pro-comabt-skins-uni-4.png?w=300&h=266 http://www.freewebs.com/leftcoastskinzfanartwork/pro-comabt-skins-uni-3.png http://nflredskins.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/pro-comabt-skins-uni-1.jpg http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h303/rd421/NikeProCombat75thAnniversaryBurg.jpg http://myimages.bravenet.com/132/905/335/4/NRedUniConceptxcopy.png http://thesonofwashington.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/nike_pro_combat_redskins_white.jpg http://thesonofwashington.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/redskins-pro-combat-extreme-uni.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v198/dzinermachine/SkinsUni2-1.jpg and yes there was an article that there would be no major changes. League says Nike deal won’t lead to dramatic jersey design changes | ProFootballTalk (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/24/league-says-significant-changes-with-shift-to-nike-arent-coming/) I just hope the uni has some changes but keeps some of it's heritage. Summo 04-03-2012, 11:44 AM Just bringing the old thread here that had some uni designs in it... http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-locker-room/46455-2012-uniform-changes-thread.html http://myimages.bravenet.com/132/905/335/4/NRedUniConceptxcopy.png http://cbswashington.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/pro-comabt-skins-uni-4.png?w=300&h=266 http://www.freewebs.com/leftcoastskinzfanartwork/pro-comabt-skins-uni-3.png http://nflredskins.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/pro-comabt-skins-uni-1.jpg http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h303/rd421/NikeProCombat75thAnniversaryBurg.jpg http://myimages.bravenet.com/132/905/335/4/NRedUniConceptxcopy.png http://thesonofwashington.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/nike_pro_combat_redskins_white.jpg http://thesonofwashington.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/redskins-pro-combat-extreme-uni.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v198/dzinermachine/SkinsUni2-1.jpg and yes there was an article that there would be no major changes. League says Nike deal won’t lead to dramatic jersey design changes | ProFootballTalk (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/24/league-says-significant-changes-with-shift-to-nike-arent-coming/) I just hope the uni has some changes but keeps some of it's heritage. IMO all those designs are shit, just some asshole playing with photoshop. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum