Redskins Add WRs Pierre Garcon and Joshua Morgan

Welcome to DC.

Ouch. Interesting you add Moss though since I think almost everyone has written him off as a goner.

4 number 2's = 8

a one, a two, a three, and a four = 10

Maybe the goal is to get the lowest number. In that case between Gaffney, moss, garcon, hankersn, and morgan we might have 4 number 2s.

next years teams is going to be a 45% runs with a lot of deep and shallow passes off of play-actions and bootlegs. Its the system the shannys wanted to run all the time.

More false assumptions.
Do you even know my point?
Because it sure seems like you're so intent on having an argument that my actuall points seem lost on you.

Your initial point is not lost to me. In fact, I find this discourse rather fruitful and pleasant, at least for me; I intend no sarcasm and harbor no ill feelings. I'll provide a brief summary of your point, just to answer your question and show your own assumptions about my intents and my mental state are false.


Your main point: Our O-line is in a worse state than our WRs.

In particular, our RT situation is horrible.
Right tackle is a more important matter for us than wide receiver. We should used our resources to acquire a player that would have improved that position.

You attempted to justify your main point by addressing the following matters:
Why our WRs are in a relatively good state.
Why our OL is in a relatively bad state.
Why addressing WR the way we did was not good
Why not addressing the OL(RT), so far, was not good.



The rest of your post is not forgotten either, and I'll respond later, but sleep beckons.

Well only time can tell the real story as to which group (WR vs OL) needs more help. I wanna believe in our braintrust (Bruce Mike and maybe Kyle) even through myriad gaffes we've seen. Mike in particular has shown the ability to build solid offensive lines, if fact I would say it's the one area where his historical performance is formidable. Let's hope he called this right and we see the oline gel together for our new franchise QB.

All these big words are starting to make my head hurt. I wish conversation stayed on a level where it was like people chilling over beers and discussing ideas and not whacking each other over the head with dictionaries.you talk good

Your main point: Our O-line is in a worse state than our WRs.

In particular, our RT situation is horrible.
Right tackle is a more important matter for us than wide receiver. We should used our resources to acquire a player that would have improved that position.Close, very close.
And maybe its too siblime a distinction to quibble over but my focus is on the benefit for the QB:...I think physical superiority at the point of attack is the single most successful way to improve an offense.
I think finding a definitive upgrade at the RT position, more then any else, would be the most beneficial to support a rookie QB.

I have high hopes for Willy too but I would rather not rely on hope as a strategy for improvement when it comes to protect our franchise QB.

Why our OL is in a relatively bad state.Not the OL as a unit:
I think our OL as unit is greater then the sum of its parts and is better then most people think.
(Football outsiders ranks our OL: 10th in run blocking 15th in pass blocking)


Why addressing WR the way we did was not good
Why not addressing the OL(RT), so far, was not good.Never said the WRs moves weren't 'good.'
Nor did I say that not addressing the RT (yet) wasn't 'good.'

Did the signing of Garcon and Morgan improve the WR corps? Yes.
But, again for me I think RT more so they any other position on offense was the weakest link on our starting 11.
I'm an oldschool type guy and I think physical superiority at the point of attack is the single most successful way to improve an offense.
I think finding a definitive upgrade at the RT position, more then any else, would be the most beneficial to support a rookie QB.
If people expect a Cam Newtonesque season from Griffin people shouldn't overlook the quality of Newton's OL.

All these big words are starting to make my head hurt. I wish conversation stayed on a level where it was like people chilling over beers and discussing ideas and not whacking each other over the head with dictionaries.That's where I try to keep it, doesn't always work out though.

No worries this round's on me.
http://telugu.oneindia.in/img/2011/11/08-hair-care08-300.jpg
Cheers

Well only time can tell the real story as to which group (WR vs OL) needs more help. I wanna believe in our braintrust (Bruce Mike and maybe Kyle) even through myriad gaffes we've seen. Mike in particular has shown the ability to build solid offensive lines, if fact I would say it's the one area where his historical performance is formidable. Let's hope he called this right and we see the oline gel together for our new franchise QB.

The offensive line, which was average last year, has experience now and should be much better by the start of the 2012 season. The offensive line does need help, but not significantly. They can play well in the trenches with who they already have.

They can play well in the trenches with who they already have.I guess you and I have very different definitions of 'well'.

I'd take 4 #2s over a 1 2 3 4 anyday