Redskins Add WRs Pierre Garcon and Joshua Morgan


SmootSmack
03-19-2012, 01:42 PM
Nah offensive TDs, returns would be Brandon Banks vs. Lions in 201.

Man, 201 was a loooooooong, loooooong time ago

Chico23231
03-19-2012, 02:02 PM
P.Garcon GOES 87 YARDS 2 PAYDIRT! - SLICKRICKDOG411 - PS3 Youtube - Watch HD Youtube On PS3 - Gametrailers - Revision3 (http://www.ps3youtube.com/v/p-garcon-goes-87-yards-2-paydirt-uN9LXjZVFqU)

I like the way he broke off Aquib Talib here. When was the last time we has a 80+ yard TD?


That was nice, surprising Talib didnt go with his bread and butter move, the ole gun clap

EARTHQUAKE2689
03-19-2012, 02:07 PM
Man, 201 was a loooooooong, loooooong time ago



Stupid auto-correct

los panda
03-19-2012, 03:12 PM
turn it off

The Goat
03-19-2012, 04:35 PM
The more I think about our FA moves and using precious cap space to get WRs over the best available olineman it seems plausable Hankerson's injury concerns are pretty serious. Too bad we didn't have the dough to do both!

Dirtbag59
03-19-2012, 04:40 PM
Key events in 201

* Lucius Annius Fabianus and Marcus Nonius Arrius Mucianus become Roman Consuls.

* November – A flood in Edessa destroys a Christian church, killing over 2,000 people.

* Osroene becomes the first state which adopts Christianity as its official religion (per New International Encyclopedia).

* Brandon Banks has TD returns called back on penalties against the Lions.

Births

* Roman emperor Trajan Decius (d. 251)
* Cheng Wu, general of the Kingdom of Wei
* Qiao Zhou, minister of the Kingdom of Shu (d. 270)

Deaths
* Possible death of Galen

MTK
03-19-2012, 04:41 PM
The more I think about our FA moves and using precious cap space to get WRs over the best available olineman it seems plausable Hankerson's injury concerns are pretty serious. Too bad we didn't have the dough to do both!

This team was in desperate need of playmakers at WR. Even if LH was 100%, I think we still would have made those moves.

SirClintonPortis
03-19-2012, 04:45 PM
Our O-line was in better shape than our WRs.

The Goat
03-19-2012, 04:46 PM
This team was in desperate need of playmakers at WR. Even if LH was 100%, I think we still would have made those moves.

Yeah but I thought a legit franchise QB could boost WR performance?! ;)

We just mortgaged the foreseeable future on our franchise QB, it stands to reason we'd do everything possible to best protect him and that means solidifying the line to me.

Garcon, Gaffney, Moss and a healthy Hankerson is a pretty decent WR group. Spending extra cap space on Morgan at the (possible) expense of London, RT, OG seems either shortsighted or indicative Hankerson is a big ?

SirClintonPortis
03-19-2012, 04:50 PM
Yeah but I thought a legit franchise QB could boost WR performance?! ;)

We just mortgaged the foreseeable future on our franchise QB, it stands to reason we'd do everything possible to best protect him and that means solidifying the line to me.

Garcon, Gaffney, Moss and a healthy Hankerson is a pretty decent WR group. Spending extra cap space on Morgan at the (possible) expense of London, RT, OG seems either shortsighted or indicative Hankerson is a big ?

Sure, you can get more out of your receivers, but they aren't getting faster or more talented. Steve Young could probably do well with Gaffney and old Moss, but Jerry Rice could do more than either of them.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum