Redskins Add WRs Pierre Garcon and Joshua Morgan


jkturtle23
03-13-2012, 09:36 PM
Per Adam Schefter on twitter

Vincent Jackson deal in Tampa: 5 yrs, $55.55 million, including $26 million guaranteed, $36 million in 1st 3 yrs, $26 million in 1st 2 yrs

For those wondering what it would have cost to get V-Jax

Lotus
03-13-2012, 09:37 PM
Well because the Saints didn't let Colston hit the open market. In an open market, he would get more

I already said that. I GET THE CREDIT. YOU ALWAYS STEAL MY CREDIT. :)

SirClintonPortis
03-13-2012, 09:37 PM
Pierre Garcon, Eddie Royal, and Josh Morgan are all young WR's that can stretch the field, which IMO is what we've lacked for years... And, anyone who thinks/says Gaffney, our only true possession WR, should be axed, especially with him coming off having his best yr, is INSANE.

Unless Royal and/or Morgan is/are also sure-handed and thus can play the possession role.

SkinzWin
03-13-2012, 09:38 PM
I already said that. I GET THE CREDIT. YOU ALWAYS STEAL MY CREDIT. :)

Pfffttt... Credit diva.

NYCskinfan82
03-13-2012, 09:39 PM
I already said that. I GET THE CREDIT. YOU ALWAYS STEAL MY CREDIT. :)

You said it first but I was thinking it first.

Lotus
03-13-2012, 09:40 PM
Unless Royal and/or Morgan is/are also sure-handed and thus can play the possession role.

Morgan could be a possession guy. He has the build and the toughness for it.

Lotus
03-13-2012, 09:41 PM
You said it first but I was thinking it first.

Damn. I lose again. :(

theJBexperience
03-13-2012, 09:43 PM
You guys think Garcon can develop into a true WR1? Will he demand double coverage? I guess he's got the best years still ahead of him, but I remember him being inconsistent, dropping as many catchable balls as making outstanding catches. Thoughts?

Skinsfanatic
03-13-2012, 09:45 PM
Hankerson___Royal_____Davis___OL____Cooley___Morga n____Garcon

Shotgun

RGIII


It ain't every down, but it is scary looking.

mbedner3420
03-13-2012, 09:47 PM
You guys think Garcon can develop into a true WR1? Will he demand double coverage? I guess he's got the best years still ahead of him, but I remember him being inconsistent, dropping as many catchable balls as making outstanding catches. Thoughts?

Why cant we assume hankerson to be our #1?

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum