SirClintonPortis
03-13-2012, 07:16 PM
Haven't read the rest of this thread, but there is an elephant in the room: Santana Moss has become absolutely expendable.
Redskins Add WRs Pierre Garcon and Joshua MorganPages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
[13]
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
SirClintonPortis 03-13-2012, 07:16 PM Haven't read the rest of this thread, but there is an elephant in the room: Santana Moss has become absolutely expendable. SkinzWin 03-13-2012, 07:17 PM Redskins Pursuing Wide Receiver Eddie Royal And Cornerback Eric Wright; According To Report - SB Nation DC (http://dc.sbnation.com/washington-redskins/2012/3/13/2868882/redskins-pursuing-wide-receiver-eddie-royal-and-cornerback-eric) Might get CB Eric Wright! SirClintonPortis 03-13-2012, 07:18 PM Man, the people at Wikipedia are really on top of things. They already have garçon on the Redskins. And they saved a bunch of paper in the process...if Wiki had been a print encyclopedia. :FIREdevil DynamiteRave 03-13-2012, 07:18 PM Redskins Pursuing Wide Receiver Eddie Royal And Cornerback Eric Wright; According To Report - SB Nation DC (http://dc.sbnation.com/washington-redskins/2012/3/13/2868882/redskins-pursuing-wide-receiver-eddie-royal-and-cornerback-eric) Might get CB Eric Wright! Maybe then we can get rid of Barnes. Oh my God. Please, get rid of Barnes. skinsfaninok 03-13-2012, 07:18 PM K bye moss... Damn Lotus 03-13-2012, 07:19 PM I wouldn't say he's the most productive. Moss was out over a month with his broken hand and has almost consistently put up 1000+ yard seasons since he's been here. Gaffney HAD to be productive cuz the rest of our WR corp at the time blew. I'm with you DRave. Moss has more talent. Gaffney caught many balls because defenses focused on taking Moss out of the play. That said, both Moss and Gaffney may be hittin' the bricks. BigHairedAristocrat 03-13-2012, 07:20 PM Haven't read the rest of this thread, but there is an elephant in the room: Santana Moss has become absolutely expendable. the only thing is that, according to the salary cap info here, we would barely save anything by cutting him. hes just as expensive to cut as he is to keep, so that could keep him here. REDSKINS4ever 03-13-2012, 07:21 PM Haven't read the rest of this thread, but there is an elephant in the room: Santana Moss has become absolutely expendable. SirClintonPortis, I was thinking the same thing. Santana Moss is a true pro and has been such a vital portion of our offense for the past 7 seasons. But unless he's going to be in a reserve role, what will be his status for the upcoming season? As a fan, I can look back to great things Moss has done for this franchise since we traded Coles for him in 2005. But it's in the best interest of this team to move forward. I like the additions to the wide receiving corps. CultBrennan59 03-13-2012, 07:22 PM I have 3 threads open right now but people keep questioning why we'd cut Gaffney. Its a money/age issue. I agree he needs to stay on the team, but thats just how the business is.. SirClintonPortis 03-13-2012, 07:23 PM the only thing is that, according to the salary cap info here, we would barely save anything by cutting him. hes just as expensive to cut as he is to keep, so that could keep him here. Well, that's what competition is for then. We'll see if he has another year with us or not. I'm fine with either route(keeping him or letting him go) if it makes sense. | |
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum