NFL taking away Redskins cap space

My thinking on this is that there's not going to be a lawsuit. Sure, there was clearly collusion,.

We will deal with your Giant envy later but do you even know what collusion is?From these posts not a whole lot of you do.

Collision is not the same thing as collusion. Are you sure you know what it is?

We will deal with your Giant envy later but do you even know what collusion is?From these posts not a whole lot of you do.

I think JoeRedskin laid it out there pretty eloquently.

We will deal with your Giant envy later but do you even know what collusion is?From these posts not a whole lot of you do.

Lol. My feelings about the Giants in this case are based on Graziano and others reporting about where this stuff is coming from. And I'm sure I'd hate Danny and Jerry too, if I were the owner of a different team. But whatever--the Meadowlands is an awful place and I don't envy anyone who must go there more than once a year.

Anywho, my impression is that the owners of the teams in the NFL (ie management) acted behind the scenes in concert to agree to keep labor costs down. Call that what you will. For what it's worth, I have no doubt that Danny gave his word and agreed at the time. He then reneged on his promise and now, 2 years later and a day before free agency, he's getting his payback from the fellas he crossed. Is that not what happened here?

I'm pissed because I am a skins fan also because of the hypocrisy of the league claiming some nonsense about "competitiveness". We were 5-11 last year and have been to the playoffs only 3 times since Danny bought the team. Yeah, the league is really scared that we're going to become the 27 Yankees. BS. It's about money and the egos of billionaires.

Whatever. To be honest, it's a kind of fun distraction in the offseason, except that it cost us 36 mil in cap space. But the cap has never stopped us before, so I'm not that worried.

(PS I lived in NYC for 20 years. The only time I root for the Vagiants is when they play the cowboys. Then I root for a tie and lots of injuries.)

http://www.picshag.com/pics/052011/they-dont-think-it-be-like-it-is-but-it-do.jpg...

and that means what exactly?? If I got back on my word on robbing a bank is someone allowed to punish me because I wasn't part of the heist?

I'm pretty sure irish is Sally Jenkins lol

I think I understand what your trying to say, but I think you used a bad example. Not that I have a better one.

In your scenario if you were apart of the planning then yes you could be punished also even if you decided to back out at the last minute. But I'll go a step further and say that what your not eluding to and that is that even though you were not there commiting the heist because you knew about it and failed to notify law enforcement then you could be charged with the same crime as the ones who did commit the crime.

Unless I'm wrong and you were eluding to the fact the Skins could get into the same trouble as the other owners in the long run because they knew all the owners were colluding and didn't tell anyone?

You're taking it a little far there lol

What I'm saying is can the person that actually committed the crime accuse you of doing something wrong while they sit nice and pretty?

I think JoeRedskin laid it out there pretty eloquently.


I'm sure you do,there could be made a case for collusion on the part of Snyder and Jones. Look you can't find one post of mine saying anything bad about Dan Snyder as a villian,I find a whole lot of his business ethics questionable I believe he plays fantasy football with a real team(yeah he is the majority owner) and the same with Jerry Jones....the fact that he hook up with him amazes me. What collusion are you fans talking about ..none of the other owners in any way shape or form tried to stop a player from making any money ...or any owner from making any money,this is all about how the contracts were structured and a majority commity choose a way for them to be done and it was "agreed upon"...4 choose to go back on their word as a owner to gain and unfair competitive advanage over the other owners ...more then some, in a salery cap move.Do you think these other 28 owners don't have lawyers ,do you not think the NFL thought this through,laws don't have to broken in busuness, business ethics count in court .

You're taking it a little far there lol

What I'm saying is can the person that actually committed the crime accuse you of doing something wrong while they sit nice and pretty?

How do you know they did anything at all?

Lol. My feelings about the Giants in this case are based on Graziano


(PS I lived in NYC for 20 years. The only time I root for the Vagiants is when they play the cowboys. Then I root for a tie and lots of injuries.)


...Check ...and mate!!!