CultBrennan59
03-12-2012, 09:25 PM
^Hello Eric Winston!
NFL taking away Redskins cap spacePages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
[30]
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
CultBrennan59 03-12-2012, 09:25 PM ^Hello Eric Winston! Jontrem 03-12-2012, 09:25 PM show your work, those numbers confuse me We have 40 million cap room this year, we are losing 36 over the next two. So say we take a 20 million hit this year and have 20 left to spend this year. Then next year we are going to lose 16 million again. Oooooor was that sarcasm that snuck right by me? WilbursHomie 03-12-2012, 09:26 PM Dan Snyder and Jerry Jones are probably the only two people that can afford better attorneys than the NFL. Take em down Danny Boy. Brody81 03-12-2012, 09:28 PM Statement from the Cowgirls: The Dallas Cowboys were in compliance with all league salary cap rules during the uncapped year. We look forward to the start of the free agency period where our commitment to improving our team remains unchanged. Dirtbag59 03-12-2012, 09:29 PM Statement from the Cowgirls: The Dallas Cowboys were in compliance with all league salary cap rules during the uncapped year. We look forward to the start of the free agency period where our commitment to improving our team remains unchanged. One of the top comments on the ESPN story: BucktheYankeesandSox Roger Godell is the only person on earth who could unite Redskins and Cowboys fans. 524 fans like this. 4 Hours Ago GTripp0012 03-12-2012, 09:33 PM Green Bay - 582 Philadelphia - 530 Pittsburgh - 522 Atlanta - 509 Houston - 490 New England - 488 New Orleans - 477 NY Jets - 466 Dallas - 466 Baltimore - 449 San Francisco - 447 Chicago - 434 San Diego - 432 Detroit - 420 NY Giants - 414 Jacksonville - 413 Miami - 412 Carolina - 408 Arizona - 407 Tennessee - 381 Buffalo - 380 Minnesota - 371 Kansas City - 370 Oakland - 361 Denver - 343 Cincinnati - 326 Tampa Bay - 316 Washington - 315 Cleveland - 315 Seattle - 289 St. Louis - 287 Indianapolis - 199 That's current as of Sellers' release. So yeah, there's a gap in the NFC between the haves the four have nots. I'll repost this list after everyone's cuts come in. It will change significantly.Revise after todays signings and cuts: Green Bay - 582 Philadelphia - 530 Pittsburgh - 522 Atlanta - 509 New England - 488 New Orleans - 477 NY Jets - 466 Dallas - 466 Houston - 464 Baltimore - 449 San Francisco - 447 Chicago - 434 San Diego - 432 Detroit - 420 NY Giants - 414 Jacksonville - 413 Miami - 412 Carolina - 408 Arizona - 407 Tennessee - 381 Buffalo - 380 Minnesota - 376 Kansas City - 372 Oakland - 343 Denver - 343 Cincinnati - 326 Tampa Bay - 316 Cleveland - 309 Washington - 304 Seattle - 289 St. Louis - 210 Indianapolis - 199 Coff 03-12-2012, 09:37 PM Jesus Christ. Way to go Skins. Well, I guess this is the business as usual in Washington they're always talking about. JWsleep 03-12-2012, 09:38 PM So, perhaps the move is: **** you. Either show us the documented infraction, properly served, or we are not going to give you a cent from our caps. Then the league will have to pony up some documentation, and we can appeal in the usual way. But to pony up the documentation would expose just how ****ed and targeted this punishment is. Then the skins and cowroids can say, hey, what about the bears, pack, etc? And off we go. Coff 03-12-2012, 09:38 PM So we had to cut Atogwe. That's great. And there's a good chance we'll have to cut Hall? What a secondary! SBXVII 03-12-2012, 09:38 PM They can't put brakes on the entire process. Push it into next year and the. Get into court. It's dumb to freeze the whole league to sort this out. and thats my point. Either stop the whole NFL process since they seemed to wait till the last minute to bring it up or hold off with any punishments until the team or both teams can argue their cases. One would hope there is an appeal process for this and that the punishement is held off untill the appeal can be heard. I just don't see how Collusion applies; Collusion | Define Collusion at Dictionary.com (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/collusion) col·lu·sion /kəˈluʒən/ [/URL]Show Spelled[kuh-loo-zhuhn] [URL="http://dictionary.reference.com/help/luna/Spell_pron_key.html"] (http://dictionary.reference.com/help/luna/IPA_pron_key.html)Show IPA noun 1. a secret agreement, especially for fraudulent or treacherous purposes; conspiracy: Some of his employees were acting in collusion to rob him. 2. Law . a secret understanding between two or more persons to gain something illegally, to defraud another of his or her rights, or to appear as adversaries though in agreement: collusion of husband and wife to obtain a divorce. Ok so A- who did the Skins have a secret agreement with? B- who was frauded? C- for what treacherous purposes? the second definition; A- who did the Skins have a secret understanding with? B- how did the Skins gain anything legally? C- who's rights were defrauded? D- who was our adversary in agreement? Please don't say we colluded with Dallas to defraud the other owners of their rights to what? get below the CAP? WTF? and if it was illegal wouldn't the Feds be getting involved? Oh wait... there was no rule or law against it. So at this point all the owners can do is come together in their monthly meeting and all agree they don't want it to happen again and then pass some rule saying they can't do it. Otherwise.... get off our backs because you all didn't think of it. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum