Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

It's the Seahawks. Would you really be surprised?



If they traded up fo Tannehill yes I would as would everyone except GTripp.

Because the Seahawks didn't just sign Matt Flynn or anything.I am not disputing that. Just pointing out that they're still aggressively involved in the quarterback market.

Will the Seahawks select QB in the later rounds? Likely; but with Flynn signing, it's EXTREMELY unlikely they're going to trade up and select Tannehill at #5.

Will the Seahawks select QB in the later rounds? Likely; but with Flynn signing, it's EXTREMELY unlikely they're going to trade up and select Tannehill at #5.

tell you the truth, I could see Carroll drafting someone like Kellen Moore out of Boise St. in the 5th or 6th rounds and have him stashed away in case Flynn is a corn on the Kolb type flop.

Seahawks, will be looking at blackmon in a trade up scenario I presume

tell you the truth, I could see Carroll drafting someone like Kellen Moore out of Boise St. in the 5th or 6th rounds and have him stashed away in case Flynn is a corn on the Kolb type flop.


HaHaHa Arizona gave Kolb a 7 million dollar bonus.
idiots!!!

I would take Tannehill over Osweiler, given the choice. But I think the Dolphins are far more likely to trade down for a Parcellsian prospect in Osweiler vs. trading up for a guy in Tannehill who their offensive coordinator has already invested a considerable amount of effort into to get him to this point.

I think Tannehill goes 5th overall to the Seahawks in a trade up.

Tannehill will definitely be the 3rd QB drafted in this draft class. I would take Brandon Weeden over Osweiler. And while I'm at it, I'd take Nick Foles over Osweiler too.

Robert Griffin III Makes Appearance At Washington-Area Memorabilia Show - Redskins Journal (http://blogs.fredericksburg.com/redskinsjournal/2012/03/31/robert-griffin-iii-makes-appearance-at-washington-area-memorabilia-show/)

Bruce Allen declares,"Unless the Colts take Tannehill with the 1st overall pick, we know which qb we're taking." (https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=you+got+had&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&biw=1092&bih=533&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=6lV4T-bFFMu70AGPuqGyCQ#um=1&hl=en&safe=off&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=you+been+duped+son&oq=you+been+duped+son&aq=f&aqi=&aql=1&gs_l=img.3...7316l12206l0l12510l21l19l0l7l2l1l98l8 46l12l12l0.egsbsh.1.&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=39cdadb1d6202e4b&biw=1092&bih=533)

But I think the Dolphins are far more likely to trade down for a Parcellsian prospect in Osweiler vs. trading up for a guy in Tannehill who their offensive coordinator has already invested a considerable amount of effort into to get him to this point.Wouldn't Sherman's experience with Tannehill make him much more appealing then Osweiler?