Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft


joeski27
03-10-2012, 10:04 PM
...but don't worry I think you'll all like what I put together...

joeski27
03-10-2012, 10:05 PM
3 more, ugh!

joeski27
03-10-2012, 10:05 PM
2 more....(10 post rule kinda sux, but oh well :) )

Ruhskins
03-10-2012, 10:06 PM
2 more....(10 post rule kinda sux, but oh well :) )

You know they ban people for doing this.

joeski27
03-10-2012, 10:06 PM
ok here we go, next post...

MTK
03-10-2012, 10:06 PM
3 more, ugh!

Sorry you're not gonna make it

JoeRedskin
03-10-2012, 10:06 PM
Wow. Good thing I am not a mod or you would be banned before ever getting to 10.

Ruhskins
03-10-2012, 10:06 PM
Sorry you're not gonna make it

Tried to tell him. These young posters nowadays. smh.

SirClintonPortis
03-10-2012, 10:07 PM
joeski27...is attempting to achieve orgasm through making forum posts. I suspect strange traumas during his childhood has resulted in his current behavior.

GTripp0012
03-10-2012, 10:07 PM
How can you conclude who won or lost a trade the day after it happened? If Bradford ends up not being that great and RG3 is an all pro QB then the Rams should have kept the pick and drafted RG3 for themselves. There are many ways it can play out...i just dont see how you can declare the rams the clear winner of the trade today. If RG3 is a great player he's worth double what they gave up and then some. The bottom line is this trade will be judged based on RG3's career and that has not even started yet...I think it's fair to judge it twice. The Rams got more than they ever could have dreamed of getting. Even if we look back on it and think: man, that Bradford is a stiff, they would have been better off with Griffin -- which we might -- they got enough first rounders to replace Bradford if need be.

You can't really judge this trade by how well the Rams draft with those picks anyway, just by how much Griffin would have improved their team over Bradford.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum