Colts Officially Release Peyton Manning (QB Thread #11)Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
[42]
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
redskins5044 03-07-2012, 11:17 PM what if the rams stay at 2? Then they take kahil but Your probably right JB will be gone at 6.. Honestly I see Tannehill at 6 if they did stay at #2 then maybe he could be there, just dont see them not trading the pick. Lotus 03-07-2012, 11:19 PM because he probably wouldnt be there. if we get manning and then browns trade with rams then the draft would probably look like this. 1.Colts-Luck 2.Browns-RG3 3.Vikings-Kahil 4.Rams-Blackmon 5.Bucs-Clairborne 6.Skins-??????? Richardson might sneak in there and bump Blackmon down to us. redskins5044 03-07-2012, 11:21 PM Richardson might sneak in there and bump Blackmon down to us. if the browns and rams swapped picks, which team would take richardson that picks ahead of us. maybe if another team trade up. diehardskin2982 03-07-2012, 11:22 PM I see us trading down if we get Manning taking Stephen Hill and Mike Adams Chico23231 03-07-2012, 11:25 PM I see us trading down if we get Manning taking Stephen Hill and Mike Adams im down with this Lotus 03-07-2012, 11:31 PM if the browns and rams swapped picks, which team would take richardson that picks ahead of us. maybe if another team trade up. Richardson is a better back than anyone on the Browns or Bucs. And Steven Jackson is not getting younger. So any of those three teams might take Richardson. redskins5044 03-07-2012, 11:37 PM Richardson is a better back than anyone on the Browns or Bucs. And Steven Jackson is not getting younger. So any of those three teams might take Richardson. well if the browns dont trade up and say the dolphins do. then i could see the browns maybe taking richardson. but dont see rams taking richardson at #2 or #4 if they do trade with browns, and the Bucs have bigger needs than RB IMO. skinsfaninok 03-07-2012, 11:43 PM Richardson is a better back than anyone on the Browns or Bucs. And Steven Jackson is not getting younger. So any of those three teams might take Richardson. Hey now! I graduated w TB running back Mossis Madu (Norman High)Tiger pride! LOL.. 44Deezel 03-07-2012, 11:49 PM i dont see these spots as more attractive than we are. the cards dont have much cap room, they do have a stud WR in fitzgerald. the fins have a good defense, and Marshall at WR. the broncos have a ton of cap room but arent normally big spenders so it might be hard for them to land manning. Jets have a loose cannon as a coach, if people dont think manning and the shanahans cant coexist, how could rex ryan and manning. the seattle team we beat this year, they have less offensive weapons than we do IMO. yes they have lynch but not much else. Add the Chiefs to the list. I just don't see him wanting to play his brother twice a year with all the other options he has to choose from. Forget everything else. The O line and weapons talk is stupid. If he did decide to come here, we'd be the top option for just about every free agent WR out there and one top flight WR is all he would need. The O line is going to be improved no matter what. Just can't see him wanting to play in the NFC East. And the money situation will work itself out. Teams would find a way to structure a deal and/or he'd take a pay cut. He's not chasing money at this stage of his career. 44Deezel 03-07-2012, 11:50 PM How do you know this??? PM himself was quoted as saying he hasn't even thought about where he would end up playing.... I spoke to Eli. Eli McFiggins, my neighbor. He knows these things;) | |
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum