NYCskinfan82
03-12-2012, 10:47 PM
i can't stand that actor
Can't stand the show, Like the actor he's originally from Queens. NYC.
Can't stand the show, Like the actor he's originally from Queens. NYC.
Redskins: 2012 Off-Season-Free Agency/TradesPages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
[71]
NYCskinfan82 03-12-2012, 10:47 PM i can't stand that actor Can't stand the show, Like the actor he's originally from Queens. NYC. Ruhskins 03-12-2012, 11:17 PM I hate using PFT as a source...but if this is true the WR market may become more competitive... Colston, Saints working hard to finish a deal | ProFootballTalk (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/12/colston-saints-working-hard-to-finish-a-deal/) Dirtbag59 03-13-2012, 01:04 AM I hate using PFT as a source...but if this is true the WR market may become more competitive... Colston, Saints working hard to finish a deal | ProFootballTalk (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/12/colston-saints-working-hard-to-finish-a-deal/) I think we're past that now. I mean seeing as how they're owned by NBC and have continued to produce credible stories over the past few years they've earned the right to be deemed legitimate. Maybe not a better source then ESPN, SI.com, etc but certainly nowhere near as bad as needing an apology above their link :D GTripp0012 03-13-2012, 01:08 AM I would say that you can't get crap in a trade for Hall, but after getting picks for both McNabb and Haynesworth, I suppose you can get a late round pick for simply being willing to do the paperwork for another team. Lotus 03-13-2012, 01:35 AM I think we're past that now. I mean seeing as how they're owned by NBC and have continued to produce credible stories over the past few years they've earned the right to be deemed legitimate. Maybe not a better source then ESPN, SI.com, etc but certainly nowhere near as bad as needing an apology above their link :D Plus PFT facts generally are on-target. PFT editorializing remains quite suspect. So as long as you are quoting facts you generally are in good shape. Dirtbag59 03-13-2012, 01:38 AM Plus PFT facts generally are on-target. PFT editorializing remains quite suspect. So as long as you are quoting facts you generally are in good shape. Exactly, the editorials are the sketchy part of PFT. An analogy if you will. Tampering is to PFT as Lupus is to House. bueW1i9kQao Ruhskins 03-13-2012, 01:42 AM I think we're past that now. I mean seeing as how they're owned by NBC and have continued to produce credible stories over the past few years they've earned the right to be deemed legitimate. Maybe not a better source then ESPN, SI.com, etc but certainly nowhere near as bad as needing an apology above their link :D PFT does a good job at gathering stories from different parts of the country and publishing it. I'd rather get scoops from Glazer, Schefter, or from local beat reporters (although some can be suspect as well). Regardless, I'd prefer to pass on a PFT story that has an additional source. | |
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum