Redskins: 2012 Off-Season-Free Agency/Trades


BigHairedAristocrat
03-12-2012, 02:03 PM
If you think, Barnes isn't even a valuable depth player, then how is hr "trade bait?" why would another team want to trade for him?

T.O.Killa
03-12-2012, 02:10 PM
If you think, Barnes isn't even a valuable depth player, then how is hr "trade bait?" why would another team want to trade for him?
Exactly!

Dirtbag59
03-12-2012, 02:12 PM
How is Hall controversial? I think thats just in the fans eyes....now underachieving, def.

I think controversial here means character issues. Like calling out the coaching staff after a game through the media. Or some of his other incidents.
zfwp-ydPQw4
Great in hockey, bad in football.

Damn Haynesworth got in on that. I wouldn't want to fight him, he'll come at you hard for like 30 seconds.
stefen0603 5 months ago 10

DCtoAZ
03-12-2012, 02:15 PM
I nominate Captain Insano
d7achvXsy3QKvcsffTQojI

Captain Insaneo shows no mercy


---
I am here: http://tapatalk.com/map.php?1k0vt1

Monkeydad
03-12-2012, 02:15 PM
I honestly do not believe we have the depth to get rid of a lineman or secondary player. Yes, FA is a possibility but we don't have many draft picks until Shallenhan starts wheeling and dealing at the draft. So I doubt it's Williams or Hall. We'd be left with even bigger gaping holes in those parts of the team with no guaranteed replacements. Very risky.

Orakpo, no way.

I'm fearing that Cooley is the most logical. I hope not.

I don't know...Adam Carricker? He has been solid but for his 13th overall draft position, an underachiever. We have Jarvis Jenkins coming back to play DE instead of NT...so he could be expendable but I'd rather keep the solid depth unless it really helps us fill a real need.

Monkeydad
03-12-2012, 02:18 PM
I think controversial here means character issues. Like calling out the coaching staff after a game through the media. Or some of his other incidents.
<video>
Great in hockey, bad in football.

To be fair, Jacobs is just as much of a trashy player at times.



I don't mind the side shows with Hall, or even lapses in coverage. He makes big plays when we need them. If we get 2 other solid corners so he's not always on the other team's #1, I'm fine with him staying.

Sometimes teams need spark plugs like this to light fires.

SmootSmack
03-12-2012, 02:20 PM
Carriker's a free agent. He wouldn't be traded

Dirtbag59
03-12-2012, 02:21 PM
Captain Insaneo shows no mercy


His ONLY negative is I feel theres a good chance he's going to test positive for cocaine somewhere down the line :D

Still I just love that pic of him and Barkley.
http://www2.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Matt+Barkley+Vontaze+Burfict+b5BAoW2KRdqm.jpg

Seriously he just played the wrong sport. If he played hockey a lot of his character issues would have been viewed as assets.

mooby
03-12-2012, 02:22 PM
If you think, Barnes isn't even a valuable depth player, then how is hr "trade bait?" why would another team want to trade for him?

Teams trade crappy picks (aka 7th rd, etc.) for "2nd chance" (which is another way of saying crappy) players all the time. If some other team thinks it can turn that players' career around and he's available for dirt cheap than why not? We did it with Adam Carriker, and look at him now. Just because I don't think KB is that good doesn't mean some other team won't take a chance on him to resurrect his career.

DCtoAZ
03-12-2012, 02:24 PM
I must admit I'm confused at all the get rid of Orakpo talk. Ugh have you not seen how much promise we have with Rak & Kerrigan ? Why would you break that up when when we just dumped picks. That's silly. And the D-Hall bashing I get but everyone wanted Los out too and how did that work out ? We don't need to unload players, we made our big deal. Why trade for a WR when we can simply go pick a FA up, stud WRs and draft a CB or SS.


---
I am here: http://tapatalk.com/map.php?5rxdwj

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum