Redskins: 2012 Off-Season-Free Agency/Trades


redskins5044
03-12-2012, 12:05 PM
I hope it's Hall, I would do cartwheels if he's traded.

Hall=no trade value

NC_Skins
03-12-2012, 12:07 PM
The first is Hall, the second is..... Hall.

Well played. Bravo...lol

BigHairedAristocrat
03-12-2012, 12:08 PM
How is Hall controversial? I think thats just in the fans eyes....now underachieving, def.

i honestly dont think hall is "underachieving" - hes performing exactly as he always has and about what we'd expect. i honestly dont get controversial either, but perhaps i dont understand what is meant by controversial - i'm assuming controversial would mean - there would be a controversy amongst fans if he were traded. With hall, i dont think there'd be too much contoversy. I also think the trent williams trade talk is a bit silly - he's only been here two years and we've got to have someone protecting our new QB. the OT market is pretty weak in free agency. we'd be fools to trade Williams at this point.

NC_Skins
03-12-2012, 12:09 PM
How is Hall controversial? I think thats just in the fans eyes....now underachieving, def.

With his shit talking. The calling out of Haslett for him not covering the best WR, only to give up 100+ yards and TD to some scrub WR the following week.


I'd say he was controversial.

SFREDSKIN
03-12-2012, 12:11 PM
Underachiever= Barnes

redskins5044
03-12-2012, 12:12 PM
i honestly dont think hall is "underachieving" - hes performing exactly as he always has and about what we'd expect. i honestly dont get controversial either, but perhaps i dont understand what is meant by controversial - i'm assuming controversial would mean - there would be a controversy amongst fans if he were traded. With hall, i dont think there'd be too much contoversy. I also think the trent williams trade talk is a bit silly - he's only been here two years and we've got to have someone protecting our new QB. the OT market is pretty weak in free agency. we'd be fools to trade Williams at this point.

dont know if williams was mentioned early in this thread about being traded. i think it would also be a mistake to trade out LT, but he is one of few players that has any trade value.

CRedskinsRule
03-12-2012, 12:18 PM
controversial = cooley (controversial because fan favorite)
underachiever = hall

Ruhskins
03-12-2012, 12:19 PM
With his shit talking. The calling out of Haslett for him not covering the best WR, only to give up 100+ yards and TD to some scrub WR the following week.


I'd say he was controversial.

So that was like what, two years ago?

T.O.Killa
03-12-2012, 12:54 PM
Underachiever=Armstrong(not much trade value)
Underachiever=Moss(last year, not much trade value)
Underachiever=Hall(not much trade value)
Underachiever=Chester(not much trade value, maybe Baltimore)


Controversial=Hall
Controversial=Davis
Controversial=T.Williams

mooby
03-12-2012, 12:59 PM
Underachiever= Barnes

That's a bingo. Barnes was a 3rd round pick, and for 3 seasons now he hasn't even been a good depth player. He should've stepped up and grabbed the nickel corner spot by last season, but he didn't even do that. He's definitely an underachiever, and probable trade bait as well.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum