Bubba305-ST21-
03-01-2012, 10:18 AM
To be completely honest, anything other than Griffin or Manning as our starting QB will be extremely depressing for me. Its time to make a big move for one of the most important positions.
I know this is was not a poll option, but I don't think its outside the realm of possibility that we could end up with Luck at #2. I know everyone just assumes the Colts will take Luck, but Griffin seems to be all the rage at the moment. Given the Colts are losing the majority of their offensive talent (manning, saturday, garcon, wayne), they may decide its in thier best interest to get a more athletic, mobile, playmaking QB. Lets be honest, the colts offensive line is horrible. Luck would get killed. I'm not saying its likely, but i definitely think its possible Luck would be available at 2.
I agree. I want RG3 the most or a healthy Peyton. i do not want any of the second tier qbs being our number one qb next year.
SmootSmack
03-01-2012, 10:18 AM
The first 9 QB threads were ok, but a 10th is just taking it way over the top!
I should have started with the 10th, done a few, and then later start with "The 1st QB Thread" Star Wars Prequel Style
This is how I see it, and how I think the Skins probably do too
Plan A: Griffin
Plan B: Manning
Plan C: Orton
mredskins
03-01-2012, 10:25 AM
This is how I see it, and how I think the Skins probably do too
Plan A: Griffin
Plan B: Manning
Plan C: Orton
Plan C will really really depress me. Orton is just Grossman spelled wrong.
Bubba305-ST21-
03-01-2012, 10:28 AM
This is how I see it, and how I think the Skins probably do too
Plan A: Griffin
Plan B: Manning
Plan C: Orton
maybe I have too much confidence/stupid hope but i think we will end up with one of the first 2. what about both?
Drewsky27
03-01-2012, 10:30 AM
I dont think the trade for the number 2 pick happens until after RG3s pro day
GoSkins!
03-01-2012, 10:35 AM
Officially, not before March 13. Unofficially, as I type right now
Wonder what the voting would have been like if I did something like Griffin/J. Johnson instead of Griffin/Grossman or Manning/Tannehill
I really don't know which of the combos I listed I'd prefer, which is why I haven't voted yet.
On the one hand Griffin/Grossman is great but we're giving up a lot of draft picks potentially. On the other hand, Peyton freakin' Manning! (even if he's not 100% healthy, he's still one of the best QBs in the league)
Tough call
Just to add another twist to the mix (being the 10th iteration on the subject and all)....
If the deal to trade up to the second pick gets done early, is there any chance the front office may try to use the second pick to trade up to the first pick to land Luck?
Plan C will really really depress me. Orton is just Grossman spelled wrong.
I can live with Orton for the short term if Tannehill is being groomed behind him.
hail_2_da_skins
03-01-2012, 10:39 AM
I would love for the Redskins to move up in the draft and select Robert Griffin III. Grossman as the backup is ok with me. If someone jumps ahead of the Redskins and snatches RGIII then I am ok with selecting Tannegill in the six slot and taking Kyle Orton in free agency. Since free agency happens first, I would sign Kyle Orton. The combination of RGIII/Orton would be ideal.
Just to add another twist to the mix (being the 10th iteration on the subject and all)....
If the deal to trade up to the second pick gets done early, is there any chance the front office may try to use the second pick to trade up to the first pick to land Luck?
And give up even more picks? I wouldn't think so.