NYCskinfan82
02-29-2012, 03:46 PM
If your joking then put LOL or haha at the end.
What is the 2nd overall pick worth?NYCskinfan82 02-29-2012, 03:46 PM If your joking then put LOL or haha at the end. EARTHQUAKE2689 02-29-2012, 03:47 PM Well we have two people who can't tell when someone is clearly joking. Bubba305-ST21- 02-29-2012, 03:48 PM He's a thug! Only thugs wear dreads! shhhh just shhh EARTHQUAKE2689 02-29-2012, 03:49 PM You need to watch your mouth. His mouth or his fingers? Seriously? Is this what we are gonna get over sensitive about? mredskins 02-29-2012, 03:50 PM I am fairly confident Mooby is being sarcastic. EARTHQUAKE2689 02-29-2012, 03:53 PM I am fairly confident Mooby is being sarcastic. I'm beyond confident that he is. CRedskinsRule 02-29-2012, 03:56 PM I'm telling you all the final trade will probably be 2012 1st 2012 2nd 2012 4th 2013 1st 2013 3rd It's going to be a lot. Unlike the Manning for Rivers trade, there was only 1 team interested, the Giants. This year we have at least 3, Us, Cleveland, and Miami. = Price goes up. Your repeating this in no way makes it fact, or close to reality. There is no market set for 5 picks like you have laid out, and our FO has not shown any inclination to agree to that type of trade. You say there are at least 3 teams, but in fact even after the top FA's go there are still options, maybe Tannehill, JC (obviously not for us), Weeden, Garrard, and others. Maybe they don't have the pop and pizazz of RGIII, but you will see teams walk away before they consider giving the Rams that type of draft. It just won't cost that much, no way - no how.(or if it does, it won't be us paying it) sdskinsfan2001 02-29-2012, 04:30 PM If I were the Skins my strategy would be to offer: 2012 - 1st round pick 2012 - 2nd round pick 2012 - 4th round pick. If the Ram's do not accept - draft Ryan Tannehill at #6. The Rams would only be dropping 4 spots and they have so many holes, any player they pick there will help that team, or they can trade down even further and rack up more picks. They already have Bradford so as a crappy team they are ahead of the curve. mooby 02-29-2012, 04:37 PM I am fairly confident Mooby is being sarcastic. Also, just in case people can't read the edit I put in there well enough, Quake and mredskins are correct that I was joking. CRedskinsRule 02-29-2012, 04:37 PM If I were the Skins my strategy would be to offer: 2012 - 1st round pick 2012 - 2nd round pick 2012 - 4th round pick. If the Ram's do not accept - draft Ryan Tannehill at #6. The Rams would only be dropping 4 spots and they have so many holes, any player they pick there will help that team, or they can trade down even further and rack up more picks. They already have Bradford so as a crappy team they are ahead of the curve. Ultimately, this is why the trade will end up being balanced if it is by us. We may be willing to give them more than someone else, but if they become unreasonable in their demand, we are in a position to go with a different player. If the Rams push a 5 pick trade I have no doubt that Shanahan and Allen will simply walk away. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum