NYCskinfan82
02-25-2012, 02:27 PM
I can see Orakpo too trade picks but I can't see Orakpo plus another high level player or even some high picks to trade up to #2.
Agree, if we give them lots of players we have to keep most of our draft picks.
GTripp0012
02-25-2012, 02:38 PM
All I'll say is that if the Redskins end up trading up to no. 2 in the next two and a half weeks (instead of on draft day when they probably don't have to go up to 2), the ultimate target isn't going to be Griffin.
It's Luck.
SBXVII
02-25-2012, 02:42 PM
Fletcher? How do you propose we trade someone who isn't under contract?
Seems tagging is the popular choice. lol.
JK, I forgot he was a FA folks chill. I don't know maybe they ask us to get a contract done with Fletcher so he can be packaged with Orakpo and picks to them for us moving up to #2? It helps us, they get the two players they want, everyone is happy. Except me of course.
redskins5044
02-25-2012, 02:46 PM
This angle hasnt been played yet, the browns have more ammo as far as draft picks, but we do have a few young players that have some value. It all depends on who we give up Orakpo would hurt a little but he was also drafted by the old regime.
skinsfaninok
02-25-2012, 02:46 PM
All I'll say is that if the Redskins end up trading up to no. 2 in the next two and a half weeks (instead of on draft day when they probably don't have to go up to 2), the ultimate target isn't going to be Griffin.
It's Luck.
Like I said in the other thread I have a feeling rg3 goes 1
Gtothearry
02-25-2012, 02:49 PM
Like I said in the other thread I have a feeling rg3 goes 1
I just don't see that happening but I'm sure the Rams would love it.
GTripp0012
02-25-2012, 02:49 PM
Like I said in the other thread I have a feeling rg3 goes 1Well, since the Colts can pretty much name their price to swap Griffin and Luck, I'd have to imagine they would.
The trade up from 6 to 2 would be cheap by comparision.
Gtothearry
02-25-2012, 02:54 PM
Well, since the Colts can pretty much name their price to swap Griffin and Luck, I'd have to imagine they would.
The trade up from 6 to 2 would be cheap by comparision.
Could you imagine if the Colts swing a trade to swap the #1 and #2 pick. Resign Peyton at a lower price and then trade the #2 pick as well. Double your pleasure and double your fun.
GTripp0012
02-25-2012, 02:56 PM
Could you imagine if the Colts swing a trade to swap the #1 and #2 pick. Resign Peyton at a lower price and then trade the #2 pick as well. Double your pleasure and double your fun.Well they want/need to draft the quarterback, but yeah, the rest is certainly within the realm of possibility.
Gtothearry
02-25-2012, 02:58 PM
Well they want/need to draft the quarterback, but yeah, the rest is certainly within the realm of possibility.
No doubt they need a QB but it would be difficult to turn away the ton of picks you could pick up by trading the #1 and #2 pick. Especially if Peyton is healthy.........