musicmaster45
02-27-2012, 05:29 PM
Idk what to think RG3 is definatley the best. I am now wanting us to do the best we can to get him.
Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
[39]
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
musicmaster45 02-27-2012, 05:29 PM Idk what to think RG3 is definatley the best. I am now wanting us to do the best we can to get him. Bubba305-ST21- 02-27-2012, 05:42 PM How is the gap between RG3 and Tannehil not that big like some people are saying if RG3 is a day 1 starter and Tennehil needs to sit a year or 2? that is quite a difference to me Chico23231 02-27-2012, 05:43 PM I think that the gap between RGIII and Tannehill is not as big as you make it out to be. your saying you start Tannehill day one then? I dont see it. I saw Tanny play 3 or 4 games this season. I was never impressed. I dont think he is better than Foles. but hey its just an opinion. I think you can start RG3 and obviously Luck. Id take Blackmon over Tanny at 6 NC_Skins 02-27-2012, 05:51 PM mcnabb didnt work out here because he had nothing left in the tank, was lazy stubborn, and did not practice well. THATS why 3 teams have dumped him in the past year. Its also why not one of the 31 other teams put a waiver claim on him when minnesota released him Not only that, but there were multiple teams with waiver requests for Kyle Orton, but not a single one (playoff bound QB needy teams) bothered to give McNugget a second thought. Guy is a lazy bum. He really does need to GTFO. Dirtbag59 02-27-2012, 05:55 PM How is the gap between RG3 and Tannehil not that big like some people are saying if RG3 is a day 1 starter and Tennehil needs to sit a year or 2? that is quite a difference to me Better arm strength, better accuracy, more experience at QB, and even better athleticism. The only real advantage Tannehill has is height and a slightly less risky style of play as well as recent experience in a pro style offense. People have to realize there is a huge difference in both raw talent and intangibles between Luck/Griffin and the rest of the class. This isn't like last year where Gabbert, Ponder, Locker, and Dalton were all similar in terms of talent and intangibles. freddyg12 02-27-2012, 06:09 PM DMac5 knows all, says that Manning will not be a Redskin. McNabb: 'Peyton's not gonna go' to the Redskins - NFL - Yahoo! Sports (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=nfp-20120227_mcnabb_peytons_not_gonna_go_to_the_redski ns) I actually agree w/his logic, it would take quite a change to fit PM in to the existing O or to change the O to his strengths. WaldSkins 02-27-2012, 06:22 PM Sorry I meant Manning and one of these guys...and then next year (ode to Dirtbag) we get a Barkley, Jones, Wilson, etc? Theres no way we get a draft Pick next year high enough to select Matt Barkley or even Landry jones Dirtbag59 02-27-2012, 06:23 PM Theres no way we get a draft Pick next year high enough to select Matt Barkley or even Landry jones We'll be high enough to pick Jones. Tyler Wilson is probably the guy thats going to shoot up draft boards. Of course the team with the number 1 pick is going to be bombarded with questions about weather Barkley's arm is strong enough to make all the throws in the NFL and if he'll be another USC QB that either completely bust or ends up a flash in the pan. skinsfaninok 02-27-2012, 06:25 PM If we have Manning or RG3/Luck next season we won't have a high draft pick SmootSmack 02-27-2012, 06:27 PM If we have Manning or RG3/Luck next season we won't have a high draft pick That's the hope |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum