Peyton Manning or RGIII your choice

All of which is irrelevant to my thinking, because I think Manning, even if totally healthy, provides such a small window to win, and one in which he is likely to decline as the team is able to build around him. It's not a recipe for success, imo.

And no, division titles aren't worth much to me. The goal should be Super Bowls, and the team should be building towards them. Which is not the likely path I see with Peyton Manning.Signing Peyton Manning reduces the current urgency to find a QB of the future through the use of a 1st round or early round draft picks.
Those early round draft picks can then be used for team building.
Areas like of team like OL, DL, DBs, WRs etc.
It also affords the luxury of developing/grooming a mid-round QB of the future the old fashioned way.
And of course the option to draft the next Robert Griffin in 2014 or 2015 will still be there.

It seems like some posters have beef with other posters.Not on my end I'm easy breezy.
I come on here to talk football and in an internet forum conversations/discussion can sometimes devolve into quibbling, which I try to avoid.

I try and post in a conversational manner the same way I would talk to a guy sitting next to me watching a game at a sports bar.

Signing Peyton Manning reduces the current urgency to find a QB of the future through the use of a 1st round or early round draft picks.
Those early round draft picks can then be used for team building.
Areas like of team like OL, DL, DBs, WRs etc.

He'll also use up an awful lot of cap room which could be used towards the same team building.

It also affords the luxury of developing/grooming a mid-round QB of the future the old fashioned way.

And if we want to use those supposed odds you used earlier, the above plan has a success rate of, what, 5%?

And of course the option to draft the next Robert Griffin in 2014 or 2015 will still be there.

And he'll win us enough games that we'll be nowhere near the pick you would need to get the next Griffin, meaning it would cost much more than it would now, assuming we even lucked into another situation of a QB as good as Griffin being available and the team holding the pick having no need for a QB.

He'll also use up an awful lot of cap room which could be used towards the same team building.Maybe, maybe not.
The reports from Manning's camp suggest that he would be willing to structure his contract in favorable manner for the express purpose of not crippling that teams ability to improve.
And Bruce Allen has done a nice job creating cap space to allow them to sign a Peyton Manning.


And if we want to use those supposed odds you used earlier, the above plan has a success rate of, what, 5%?You seem a bit salty huh?
The numbers are whatever the numbers are, the statistical outcome doesn't mean it can't or won't succeed.
We could represent the minor percentage that succeeds.

If you want to crunch the numbers and let me know be my guest.
Lets say Peyton plays for 3 years and each year they draft a developmental QB in the mid-rounds (3rd and down).


And he'll win us enough games that we'll be nowhere near the pick you would need to get the next Griffin, meaning it would cost much more than it would now, assuming we even lucked into another situation of a QB as good as Griffin being available and the team holding the pick having no need for a QB.If we're shouting hypotheticals why not win the SB?
We don't have to get lucky for there to be other great QB prospects, there are great QB in almost every draft class.

And if a team wants a to draft a QB they can always trade up, draft position doesn't have to preclude a team from acquiring the prospect they want.

Maybe, maybe not.
The reports from Manning's camp suggest that he would be willing to structure his contract in favorable manner for the express purpose of not crippling that teams ability to improve.
And Bruce Allen has done a nice job creating cap space to allow them to sign a Peyton Manning.

And he's still going to cost a lot of money. If you don't think so, you're kidding yourself.

And even assuming this "I'll play for incentives" talk doesn't go completely out the window once the bidding starts, those incentives will be in the likely to be earned category (probably mostly for games played), which means you have to use the cap space anyway and get it back if he doesn't reach them. So either he costs a lot or he's worthlesss, basically.


You seem a bit salty huh?
The numbers are whatever the numbers are, the statistical outcome doesn't mean it can't or won't succeed.
We could represent the minor percentage that succeeds.

If you want to crunch the numbers and let me know be my guest.
Lets say Peyton plays for 3 years and each year they draft a developmental QB in the mid-rounds (3rd and down).

Facts are facts. And the chances of finding a premier QB in the 3rd round are virtually nil, despite you using several draft picks, which could have gone to the team building you were so concerned with.

If we're shouting hypotheticals

How is this just a hypothetical? Is the plan actually to sign Manning and have him suck so much we're picking top 10 again?

why not win the SB?

I've already said I don't see us winning a SB with Peyton.

We don't have to get lucky for there to be other great QB prospects, there are great QB in almost every draft class.

And they're almost always drafted by the teams with the top picks.

And if a team wants a to draft a QB they can always trade up, draft position doesn't have to preclude a team from acquiring the prospect they want.

And again, even if it were possible it's going to cost a ton. If you're going to blanch at the price to go from 6 to 2, just wait what it will be to go from the late teens (or lower) to number 1.

did your attorney prepare that post?

Not on my end I'm easy breezy.
I come on here to talk football and in an internet forum conversations/discussion can sometimes devolve into quibbling, which I try to avoid.

I try and post in a conversational manner the same way I would talk to a guy sitting next to me watching a game at a sports bar.

Cover Girl?

too much waaah... a two option poll shouldn't need 287+ posts like this. it's circular and annoying.

and it gave me night terrors last night

too much waaah... a two option poll shouldn't need 287+ posts like this. it's circular and annoying.

I imagine it's only gonna get worse after the combine and pro days...