redskins5044
02-11-2012, 01:53 PM
Who?
Mr. Synders banker
Mr. Synders banker
Peyton Manning or RGIII your choicePages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
[18]
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
redskins5044 02-11-2012, 01:53 PM Who? Mr. Synders banker mooby 02-11-2012, 01:55 PM Who? Him and Tony Wylie used to be huge wiffleball buddies back at UT. NC_Skins 02-11-2012, 01:57 PM They would probably have to surrender the 2012 1st, 2013 1st, and possibly Orakpo to make this happen, But in no way would they have to surrender the whole 2012 draft to get RGIII, that is ridiculous. No one is considering that Orakpo has possibly peaked and is very tradable at this point. Jeff Fisher would probably see this deal as 3 first rounders for the no.2 pick this year. Very doable. I don't think you've seen anybody suggest they would have to give up their whole 2012 draft. My scenario was a rough draft of the approximate costs give or take a pick or sliding one of those picks down/up. It's still going to take a lot. More than we can afford to give up. However, based on the points, that's about what it would take. If we had to give up Orakpo and our 2012 1st for RGIII, I would probably do that providing no other picks were involved. NC_Skins 02-11-2012, 02:04 PM Mr. Synders banker ZING!! http://files.sharenator.com/well_played_45585740437_FunnyWeirdAwesome_Pictures _2_36_Pics-s332x360-250064-580.jpg SBXVII 02-11-2012, 02:13 PM [QUOTE=celts32;884289]Thats highly speculative. A trade down is not always available when you want it. Regardless that's not really the point. I don't care how many picks it is...I want the QB problem solved LONG TERM. The teams that win consistently in this league are the ones with the franchise QB's. We need to get one if we want to be something more then a surprise playoff team every now and then. QUOTE] Just like trading up is just as speculative. There is a lot of unknowns, What are the Rams asking for? not what we think it should be but what are the Rams asking for? Are the Rams even willing to trade? maybe they want RGIII? I think we all want the QB position locked up LONG TERM. But there is no guarentee with RGIII either. Which is why I'm not up for tossing 4+ picks at just one person in hopes he is and possibly later finding out he's not. Now if this was Drew Brees, or Eli Manning or an already established proven QB then I'm all in and would throw 4+ draft picks for the team to get him. SmootSmack 02-11-2012, 02:17 PM Who? You'd like for me to deliver that info to you? Son Of Man 02-11-2012, 02:19 PM Hopefully, this is the last time that we will be picking in the top 10. In other words, the last time we will have the opportunity to draft a top 10 QB talent...even if we have to trade upon for it. Otherwise you will be giving up Julio Jones compensation to get Barkley next year...for example. Trade for Griffin now, so we can avoid the QB convo next year. Worked for the Giants in 2004. SBXVII 02-11-2012, 02:23 PM Interesting that some continue to think that. Why I'm really not sure. Because they want to muddy the waters. They also say that the Skins are too far off to try and get a Peyton Manning who will only be here 3 yrs if at all and keeping the Skins from getting a young QB to develope who is a franchise QB. Too far off but they want to throw 4+ picks away to get one player. A franchise player and RGIII is not a franchise player. Atleast not yet. Right now all he is is a really good college QB just like Luck. Chico23231 02-11-2012, 02:25 PM You'd like for me to deliver that info to you? Can you deliver that in a Haiku? Son Of Man 02-11-2012, 02:33 PM 3,000+ posts in just over a year. Someone needs a social life... No, social networking doesn't count. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum