Peyton Manning or RGIII your choice


Dirtbag59
02-19-2012, 12:12 AM
It's all hypothetical. No one knows how high Tannehill will go. If the estimations are correct and he's valued as a mid-first round pick, then it would cost relatively less to pull off that trade than one at the top of the draft.

He will either go to Seattle or he will fall hard.

biffle
02-19-2012, 12:17 AM
What facts?

That Hoyer has been in the league for 3 years thrown 43 passes for 286 yards and 1 touchdown. That only goes to further prove my point.

Dude are you his cousin?

Jesus dude, give it up. The only thing more idiotic than your original "point" is the idiotic way you've tried to defend it.

diehardskin2982
02-19-2012, 12:17 AM
Nah, in all seriousness RGIII. And for him I'm more then willing to do the Eli trade. I saw how effective the running game in Atlanta was off bootlegs with Michael Vick, running lanes wide open and not because of blocking but fear of the QB hitting the edge and breaking off a big game leaving Warrick Dunn and TJ Duckett looking like pro bowl backs.

I can only imagine how that would work here in Washington, especially considering the fact that RGIII won't need 10 years and a prison term to learn how to pass in the NFL.

Andrew Luck would be great but we would have to hit on a lot more then two or three draft picks to equal the impact someone like RGIII will bring to this franchise for the next decade.

I couldn't agree more! I believe that RGIII will have the same effect on our rushing offense.

biffle
02-19-2012, 12:23 AM
He will either go to Seattle or he will fall hard.

Not necessarily. Another team could trade up for him. Denver or Cleveland (with their second 1st) could be in the market for him.

GTripp0012
02-19-2012, 12:23 AM
Nah, in all seriousness RGIII. And for him I'm more then willing to do the Eli trade. I saw how effective the running game in Atlanta was off bootlegs with Michael Vick, running lanes wide open and not because of blocking but fear of the QB hitting the edge and breaking off a big game leaving Warrick Dunn and TJ Duckett looking like pro bowl backs.

I can only imagine how that would work here in Washington, especially considering the fact that RGIII won't need 10 years to learn how to pass in the NFL.

Andrew Luck would be great but we would have to hit on a lot more then two or three draft picks to equal the impact someone like RGIII will bring to this franchise for the next decade.I understand that Griffin is going to go a lot higher in the draft, but I have a hard time rectifying that with not wanting to grab a Jason Campbell or Patrick Ramsey level prospect, because while Griffin is exciting and everything and a Heisman winner, Campbell and Ramsey were really highly regarded as well coming out. I mean, not Andrew Luck regarded (I was anticipating you responding with Luck), but nothing that's being said about Griffin's upside now hasn't been said about past QB prospects drafted by the Redskins in the first round. I promise you that the need to change the QB every year is not for lack of trying to find a long term solution.

I think the Griffin hype is very justified, and he adds the element of the highlight reel play (which Campbell and Ramsey were never going to give you), but at the end of the day, drafting a first round quarterback who isn't the consensus no. 1 QB in the draft is the same road the Redskins have been on.

A proposition to give up multiple drafts and get Andrew Luck? Now that would be a change in organizational philosophy from the past -- aside from being nearly impossible to execute.

***

Out of curiosity, do you think the Redskins would be better off today if they had beaten the Bears' price to get Cutler? No Orakpo, no Trent Williams, maybe no Kerrigan, and you'd have a quarterback who is somewhere between the tenth and twentieth best player at his profession in the world. But on the plus side, you would have saved the picks that went into the McNabb trade, and might have made the postseason in 2010? Although that last part might be wishful thinking.

diehardskin2982
02-19-2012, 12:23 AM
Jesus dude, give it up. The only thing more idiotic than your original "point" is the idiotic way you've tried to defend it.

You sound real bitter bro... I have not insulted your intelligence or done anything more than ask you to back your theory on Hoyer. Other than he plays for the Patriots there is no arguement as to why we should aquire him. I DO NOT want the Redskins to get caught in the same trap as the Chiefs. I want us to go in different direction either with PM or RGIII.

Respect that and move on. Stop being a Troll.

biffle
02-19-2012, 12:42 AM
You sound real bitter bro... I have not insulted your intelligence or done anything more than ask you to back your theory on Hoyer. Other than he plays for the Patriots there is no arguement as to why we should aquire him. I DO NOT want the Redskins to get caught in the same trap as the Chiefs. I want us to go in different direction either with PM or RGIII.

Respect that and move on. Stop being a Troll.

Not bitter and not a troll.

You made the ridiculous "point" about Mallett being drafted proving something about Hoyer's ability. When it's pointed out that they felt enough of him to keep him as the only back-up to Brady for two years and only drafted Mallett to replace him after he's a FA, you then question the Pats' competence because they lost SB and haven't won one in 7 years. Not only is that a pathetic argument, but it completely contradicts the "logic" of the first one, as that was entirely based on the Patriots' judgement meaning something. Since then, you've thrown out several comments that have absolutely nothing to do with what you started and then even fell back into "well, they drafted Mallett" again.

Don't post anything if you can't handle people pointing out when you're wrong. And if you're going to refuse to admit it and then fling out misdirection and contradictory statements to deflect from it, you better be able to deal with people questioning you, if not your intelligence itself.

Pigskins
02-19-2012, 12:56 AM
Guys relax, in a honesty it doesn't matter what we want, MS will get the Qb he wants and as skins fans we will rally and love the decision regardless

Dirtbag59
02-19-2012, 01:09 AM
Guys relax, in a honesty it doesn't matter what we want, MS will get the Qb he wants and as skins fans we will rally and love the decision regardless

We did that last year. The result was Rex Grossman and John Beck. We also did it the year before. The result was Donovan McNabb.

Dirtbag59
02-19-2012, 01:11 AM
Not necessarily. Another team could trade up for him. Denver or Cleveland (with their second 1st) could be in the market for him.

Good point. I forgot Cleveland at 22.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum