Peyton Manning or RGIII your choice

I never said I would trade 5 high picks for anyone.

Ok what picks would u give up for RG3 or Luck?

RGIII Swap firsts, 2013 1st, 2012 2nd or 3rd. Offer the third first to see if they take the bait.

Luck Swap firsts, 2013 1st, 2014 2nd is what I said eariler I'll change that this years 2nd.

I've come down from my initial 2012 1st, 2013 1st, 2012 3rd, 2013 4th. I'd probably still do it but I'd be hesitant.

Since we would be swapping 1sts we would only be giving up 2 picks.

I'm starting to feel like the Skins only option will be taking a pick at #6 and maybe trading back into the 1st round with their second round pick and another pick(s) to get a QB, likely Tannehill.

All we would need to give up for the 2nd pick should only be roughly 2012 1st, 2013 1st and 3rd MAYBE, and may not even be that much it's only 4 spots

Ok what picks would u give up for RG3 or Luck?

Two first and a third. Same as the Eli Manning trade.

All we would need to give up for the 2nd pick should only be roughly 2012 1st, 2013 1st and 3rd MAYBE, and may not even be that much it's only 4 spots

That doesn't seem like a lot but, imagine if the Skins didn't have a first round and third round pick this year? We've seen that and it ain't fun. Not only that, it forces the team to overspend for FAs.

All we would need to give up for the 2nd pick should only be roughly 2012 1st, 2013 1st and 3rd MAYBE, and may not even be that much it's only 4 spots

It's going to cost more then that sorry, we would only be really giving up 2 picks. There is going to competition for that #2 pick, from the browns, seahawks, dolphins, and could be some sleeper teams wanting to trade up like chiefs or jags.

Here's what puzzles me: Some people here don't want to trade next years 1st to get RGIII but would be fine with BPA and trade back into the 1st round to get Tannehill. What do you think we'd be giving up to get back into the first rd? Heinz ketchup?

Two first and a third. Same as the Eli Manning trade.

Wgen it's all said and done I feel that is what it will end up being. Whether we move to #2 or #3.

Here's what puzzles me: Some people here don't want to trade next years 1st to get RGIII but would be fine with BPA and trade back into the 1st round to get Tannehill. What do you think we'd be giving up to get back into the first rd? Heinz ketchup?

Nope we should just take him at #6. Lol