|
|
Lotus 02-12-2012, 04:45 PM Appreciate it.
Ideally we would acquire Tannehill by trading back and picking him up in the end of the 1st round, acquiring an additional 2nd rd pick along the way.
But who knows, it's all going to depend on how FA pans out, and who's drafted before we pick.
Welcome to the board. You stole my argument. :) Great minds think alike.
TheMalcolmConnection 02-12-2012, 04:45 PM Appreciate it.
Ideally we would acquire Tannehill by trading back and picking him up in the end of the 1st round, acquiring an additional 2nd rd pick along the way.
But who knows, it's all going to depend on how FA pans out, and who's drafted before we pick.
That's my ideal scenario. If we give up a couple of year's worth of draft picks, we might still have a major letdown even if the QB we choose works out.
FA is still a great venue for adding talent, but if we are missing high picks in the draft for 2-3 years when we lack so much talent, I'd just rather have the picks.
Don't get me wrong, the QB situation HAS to be addressed, but not at the cost. Maybe we end up trading up and it's way more cost effective than any of us think, but I won't hold my breath on that one...
SmootSmack 02-12-2012, 04:53 PM So much depends on how FA plays out, but I'm not sure I see Tannehill making it past Seattle at 12.
But let's say we sign Peyton, then I could see a trade down into the later 2nd/early 3rd where you pick a guy like Foles or Cousins and/or maybe you find someway to add a 1st in 2013
TheMalcolmConnection 02-12-2012, 04:57 PM So much depends on how FA plays out, but I'm not sure I see Tannehill making it past Seattle at 12.
But let's say we sign Peyton, then I could see a trade down into the later 2nd/early 3rd where you pick a guy like Foles or Cousins and/or maybe you find someway to add a 1st in 2013
And THAT would be one hell of a price to pay to move up that high. PROVIDED we can get an improvement over Grossman, I'm OK just letting the next few years play out with whomever is at QB.
If that Luck deal was still possible, I'm willing to take that risk, but right now I don't know if I'd trade a ton of picks to move up for RGIII.
NYCskinfan82 02-12-2012, 04:59 PM IMO signing PM will make some FA want to come here, other than money.
Chico23231 02-12-2012, 05:08 PM In trade down scenario, I like the trade back with Cincy, the 17th and 21st pick. They are looking for a RB, Trent is there for them. We pick 17 and could trade back again with the 21st.
TheMalcolmConnection 02-12-2012, 05:12 PM In trade down scenario, I like the trade back with Cincy, the 17th and 21st pick. They are looking for a RB, Trent is there for them. We pick 17 and could trade back again with the 21st.
Who do you take there that's still available? If Tannehill is gone, I'd take the best OT available and then CB.
NYCskinfan82 02-12-2012, 05:14 PM In trade down scenario, I like the trade back with Cincy, the 17th and 21st pick. They are looking for a RB, Trent is there for them. We pick 17 and could trade back again with the 21st.
That would be fantastic, wishfull thinking.
NYCskinfan82 02-12-2012, 05:17 PM Who do you take there that's still available? If Tannehill is gone, I'd take the best OT available and then CB.
Agree, not really worried about Tann, if we're picking in the first then We have PM or best FA QB available & we will be picking up a project QB in the late 2nd to 4th round IMO.
biffle 02-12-2012, 05:26 PM Who do you take there that's still available? If Tannehill is gone, I'd take the best OT available and then CB.
If Cincy did that (unlikely) then I would want Tannehill and Adams/Glenn. If I couldn't do one or the other (almost certainly Tannehill, as I can't imagine both of those Ts would be gone), then I would probably want to trade down again.
|