Why we aren't getting any good QB & still be bad

I don't see anything silly or funny about this. When all this happens you won't be laughing come september-december.

Cultbrennan59 first, the irony in your name and your pessimism of the QB situation is awesome.

I think we are suffering from just going through a year with the worst QB play in the NFL. It can get better. Rex is horrible, Becks was worse if that is possible to imagine. It will get better. Even if Orton, Henne, or a 2nd round QB pick starting for us next year.

You also gotta understand Rex and Becks supporting cast on the offense was poor to begin with as well. Our personal at WR and Oline will also improve as well.

With the WR's he had, any QB would have been a dink and dunker on that team. I'm pretty sure the Rams lead the league in dropped passes too. There is a large majority of the league who views Bradford as a great QB who hasn't had a great team around him.I'm not criticizing Bradford for going underneath a lot: Peyton Manning won a super bowl doing exactly that after years of watching Harrison and Wayne not ever beat their coverage in the playoffs. What Peyton didn't do was complete 53% of his passes.

At 64%+, Bradford is an intelligent, gritty winner. Below 58%, he's a bust. I suspect he'll be in between those figures next year.

We should have signed Steve DeBerg.

Classic messed up thread title.

The subject of the thread already is being discussed elsewhere.

bradfords a #1 overall pick he has 3 years to show his talents he'll be in year 3 people around the league believe that he hasn't had the talents or the fair judgement being that the team he was on was awful. You put Peyton Manning or Tom Brady on that team their still not much better. No WR's, no defense, awful OL.


McCoy on the other hand has a great OL, and solid defense. His WR core could be better. His RB situation wasn't as good this year with Hillis being often injured. McCoy wasn't a high draft pick so therefore he isn't given as much time as Bradford.I don't think draft status is meaningful in regards to the comparison between McCoy and Bradford.
Coaches look at the bottom line, they look at production.
They're only gonna keep a QB because they think he can be the guy.
A coach isn't going to keep a QB only because he's a 1st round draft pick, especially a coach from a new regime.

I think the only real difference between the 2 is your perception.
There are smaller differences that I'm not going to quibble over but suffice it to say that neither QB has played under ideal circumstances.

Career:
Sam Bradford
57.6 5676 24 TD 21 INT 6.0 YPA 74.2 rating
Colt McCoy
58.4 4309 20 TD 20 INT 6.3 YPA 74.5 rating
__________________
http://www.thewarpath.net/877046-post741.html

http://g.static.memegenerator.net/cache/instances/500x/13/13762/14092392.jpg

http://g.static.memegenerator.net/cache/instances/500x/13/13762/14092392.jpg

Hey Ruh, foof is a word.

Hey Ruh, foof is a word.

That's why his sig says "New words created on the Warpath."

Also, Ruh, I completely agree. We've only had the offseason for a month and yet it feels like eternity. Only 3 more months of this before we have a full idea of who we're going into 2012 with at qb.

That's why his sig says "New words created on the Warpath."

Also, Ruh, I completely agree. We've only had the offseason for a month and yet it feels like eternity. Only 3 more months of this before we have a full idea of who we're going into 2012 with at qb.

I didn't create it though and we all know how much I don't like taking others credit.

I didn't create it though and we all know how much I don't like taking others credit.

Touche.