How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan

Dallas Sartz. No THERE'S a name I haven't heard in a while. Nice memory.

Agreed. I'm taking credit for an assist though.

And in less than three paragraphs!!! Double Win!!!

(Not that I have much room to mock when it comes to brevity ...)

Agreed. I'm taking credit for an assist though.


Dude you kind of have to get a life outside of football, it is kind of sad the amount energy you put into it.

You're right to an extent mredskins, but who would really think this is sad? The people who would love to invest as much time into a hobby as I am fortunate to be able to? I'm the lucky one.

You're right to an extent mredskins, but who would really think this is sad? The people who would love to invest as much time into a hobby as I am fortunate to be able to? I'm the lucky one.

If you say so, who am I to judge.

To add and not to be mean but I used to read your post but of late (like the past year or so) you are so long winded and not to the point, I hardly bother to read anything you posted. You kind of suffer from diarrhea of the mouth.

eh thats a lil harsh mreskins. Tripp even when i disagree your opinion is value added. I think you get lil too wrapped up in stats, lose sight of big picture, but its all good.

Normally, I'd drop a "thanks for reading!" here, but in light of mredskins, I think I'll have to amend that to just "thanks!" ;)

Normally, I'd drop a "thanks for reading!" here, but in light of mredskins, I think I'll have to amend that to just "thanks!" ;)


Perfect!

GTripp lemme throw you some love, your in depth analysis is pretty great. I especially love when you go over the game tape and tell how many times our linemen screwed up, because that's stuff you don't catch during live action.

I tend to be long winded myself, it's a trait often associated with highly analytical and detailed people. I don't always agree with your conclusions, but it's clear you put a ton of thought into it, and all you need sometimes is to message yourself more concisely. It would make your analysis even more powerful.

GTripp lemme throw you some love, your in depth analysis is pretty great. I especially love when you go over the game tape and tell how many times our linemen screwed up, because that's stuff you don't catch during live action.

I tend to be long winded myself, it's a trait often associated with highly analytical and detailed people. I don't always agree with your conclusions, but it's clear you put a ton of thought into it, and all you need sometimes is to message yourself more concisely. It would make your analysis even more powerful.That was the lesson I got out of this thread, presented by SmootSmack. I had never considered trying to do rebuttals in Twitter form, but sometimes entities need to see new ideas in action before they see the error in their ways.