EARTHQUAKE2689
01-30-2012, 05:19 PM
Depends on what the other picks are, but generally speaking it wouldn't be the worst thing we could do.
Not the worst thing but it's definitely not what I want to see happen:
1st choice: Andrew Luck
2nd choice: Robert Griffin III
3rd choice: Morris Claiborne
4th choice: Justin Blackmon
5th choice: Trent Richardson
6th choice: Trade down
7th choice: Dre Kirkpatrick
8th choice: 1st round offensive lineman
redskins forever
01-30-2012, 05:31 PM
why do you just get a matt flynn, or someone close to that, keep grossman as a backup, and hold on to next year and then try to get matt barkley and just spend this years draft getting playmakers and more depth
Gmanc711
01-30-2012, 05:34 PM
why do you just get a matt flynn, or someone close to that, keep grossman as a backup, and hold on to next year and then try to get matt barkley and just spend this years draft getting playmakers and more depth
Cause whether he's worth it or not, Flynn is probably going to be looking for starter money.. and you don't make that investment just to draft someone in a year.
EARTHQUAKE2689
01-30-2012, 05:35 PM
why do you just get a matt flynn, or someone close to that, keep grossman as a backup, and hold on to next year and then try to get matt barkley and just spend this years draft getting playmakers and more depth
Because we would be paying Matt Flynn $50 million to be a stopgap, Grossman would still be on the roster, we would need the worst record to get Matt Barkley and that won't happen and we did that last year, time to get our QB. No more next years class is better BS.
KI Skins Fan
01-30-2012, 05:41 PM
Am I the only one would be upset with a 1st round top 10 pick OT?
I wouldn't like it either. There seems to be a number of good OT prospects in this draft such as Barrett Jones, Zebrie Sanders, and Levy Adcock, who we can get later.
I'd have no problem with trading down if we couldn't get any of your Top 5.
NC_Skins
01-30-2012, 05:43 PM
Am I the only one would be upset with a 1st round top 10 pick OT?
Considering your LT is one bong hit away from a years suspension and your RT is most likely not going to be on the squad, no I wouldn't be upset with it.
IrMitchell
01-30-2012, 05:48 PM
I'd be upset if it was Riley Reiff. He got killed in his final two games.
I'm honestly tempted to draft Coples/Upshaw and have the best rushing core in the league.
EARTHQUAKE2689
01-30-2012, 05:49 PM
Considering your LT is one bong hit away from a years suspension and your RT is most likely not going to be on the squad, no I wouldn't be upset with it.
Suspension is the ugly way of looking at it. Think of it as a yearlong mandatory vacation from work.
EARTHQUAKE2689
01-30-2012, 05:50 PM
I'd be upset if it was Riley Reiff. He got killed in his final two games.
I'm honestly tempted to draft Coples/Upshaw and have the best rushing core in the league.
Put Michael Brockers in that group too.
skinsguy
01-30-2012, 05:52 PM
Tough to say, but probably Claiborne since they expect to make some moves for WR during free agency.
If we stay at 6, and he's not taken yet, I think Claiborne is probably at the top of our list. Or they may go with someone like Riley Reiff
I know a lot of people think they'd just take Tannehill at #6, but I've never thought that. And, for various reasons, I'm starting to have some doubts on just how much they really like him.
Yeah at this point, I think drafting Ryan Tannehill at #6 would be ridiculous.