The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Our QB priority:

1. Luck

2. Bradford

3. RG3

1. Not going to happen.
2. Not going to happen.
3. Not going to happen.

I hope they've got a Plan D.

Damn, it's January 3rd and I'm already exhausted. We're going to do this for the next 4 months, aren't we?

Damn, it's January 3rd and I'm already exhausted. We're going to do this for the next 4 months, aren't we?

Yup... :party-smi

I'd be shocked if the colts took RG

The Tebow lovefest is over and they're not even eliminated from the playoffs?

LOL, i know i agree thats kinda shitty, but, Elway never said he had his qb of the future, in fact he said the opposite, so Im not surprised, tebow wont be on the broncos next year. barring a SB win.

Only a couple days removed from the last game of the regular season, and the rumors of where these quarterbacks are going to land next season are already mind boggling. I think it's a stretch that Denver will be able to move up to #2 to land RG III. I don't see that happening at all.

I'm almost expecting the Redskins to merely grab a better backup QB through free agency, use their draft picks to continue building depth, and living with Rex one more year in hopes of landing Barkley next year. Might not be such a bad idea.

^ I have also mulled this thought, i think its a strong possibility

Only a couple days removed from the last game of the regular season, and the rumors of where these quarterbacks are going to land next season are already mind boggling. I think it's a stretch that Denver will be able to move up to #2 to land RG III. I don't see that happening at all.

I'm almost expecting the Redskins to merely grab a better backup QB through free agency, use their draft picks to continue building depth, and living with Rex one more year in hopes of landing Barkley next year. Might not be such a bad idea.

And if the Skins go 6-9, with a bottom third pick again?

Well the Seahawks, who I still think are the favorites for Flynn, will take one of those guys at 12 (I think it's 12) if they're available (and they don't get Flynn)

And there's also the Dolphins, who interestingly enough could be interviewing Mike Sherman for a head coaching position.

So they can't drop back too much it seems

Although I seem to be the only one here arguing for grabbing Tannehill or Jones at #6, this is why. I would not trade back any later than #8. Otherwise the Fins or Seahawks may grab our guy, thus meaning we've missed our guy for the second straight year. Reach be damned - get your guy.

I think Landry Jones could start day one in Kyle's offense because I don't think Kyle's offense requires the quarterback to have a great grasp of coverages to complete passes down the field.I think either QB has the skillset to start or sit.
I'm not into predicting whether a QB can/will start.
Its largely dependent on the volition of the staff that drafts them.

The biggest Landry Jones problem is how much his accuracy suffers when he is pressured. I mean, every quarterback's accuracy suffers when pressured, but when Jones can stand back and deliver the football, he's really accurate. When he has to move, he has awful fundamentals. Right now, Landry Jones lacks even the ability to buy an extra half second to get rid of the ball. Which should be worrisome.Yeah, that's one of the reason why I think Tannehill is a better prospect.

I still think he's a much better fit than Tannehill. Kyle requires a passer with superior pocket mechanicsQue paso?

I don't follow your reasoning on why you think Jones is a better fit?
Tannehill knows the offense, Tannehill is more mobile and can extend plays.