diehardskin2982
01-16-2012, 05:29 PM
We mortgage 2 years of draft picks for RGIII, so what! It's solidarity at the position for the next 5-10 years. I'm okay with that.
The "Inside Word" on the QB SearchPages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
[54]
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
diehardskin2982 01-16-2012, 05:29 PM We mortgage 2 years of draft picks for RGIII, so what! It's solidarity at the position for the next 5-10 years. I'm okay with that. NYCskinfan82 01-16-2012, 05:55 PM If we are able to pick a few key positions in FA like OG, OT, CB, FS, & ILB then trade away our 1st & 2nd this year & next years 1st & 3rd if that's what it takes. VTSkins1961 01-16-2012, 06:04 PM I would not trade more than that. In my humble opinion anything more than that is too much for any 1 player. I agree RG3 will most likely be a "franchise qb". What I'm saying is is sign a decent qb free agent then we won't as pressured to sell the farm for 1 player. cdskins26 01-16-2012, 06:05 PM We mortgage 2 years of draft picks for RGIII, so what! It's solidarity at the position for the next 5-10 years. I'm okay with that. If we mortgage the draft and use FA INTELLIGENTLY. No monster contracts, but bring in a #1 receiver at as cheap as possible, unless were convinced we have our guy, in which case throw some money at him. Bring in a secondary receiver like braylon edwards to compete in camp (a lot better than stalworth or stokley as competition) and then we can spend what is left in the draft on our offensive line. Next years draft can center around cornerbacks and replacing fletch. NYCskinfan82 01-16-2012, 06:10 PM I would not trade more than that. In my humble opinion anything more than that is too much for any 1 player. I agree RG3 will most likely be a "franchise qb". What I'm saying is is sign a decent qb free agent then we won't as pressured to sell the farm for 1 player. I agree, I've stated this in another post, we have to have a contingency plan we have to sign a FA QB otherwise we will be over paying to trade up. I would like to sit a #6 and see if RGIII falls to us. Nobody expected SackPo to fall to us but he did. Dirtbag59 01-16-2012, 06:16 PM As I've basically been saying before. RGIII is Michael Vick, if Michael Vick had an IQ in the 140 range, was accurate, and wasn't interested in partying all the time. Sure the price to get him will be steep but considering the payoff of 10 plus possible years of stability at the games most important position, not to mention an actual game changer that will strike fear into the hearts of defenses everywhere, well it's hard to be frugal. Honestly, guys like Landry, Orakpo, Kerrigan, and Williams are nice, but they're supporting pieces. Without a QB we're wasting their prime years. I think that RGIII can have the type of impact that Ovechkin had on the Capitals. SkinzWin 01-16-2012, 06:20 PM As I've basically been saying before. RGIII is Michael Vick, if Michael Vick had an IQ in the 140 range, was accurate, and wasn't interested in partying all the time. Sure the price to get him will be steep but considering the payoff of 10 plus possible years of stability at the games most important position, not to mention an actual game changer that will strike fear into the hearts of defenses everywhere, well it's hard to be frugal. Honestly, guys like Landry, Orakpo, Kerrigan, and Williams are nice, but they're supporting pieces. Without a QB we're wasting their prime years. I think that RGIII can have the type of impact that Ovechkin had on the Capitals. What's that? Dominate the regular season only to lose in the playoffs every year?!? lol EARTHQUAKE2689 01-16-2012, 06:23 PM What's that? Dominate the regular season only to lose in the playoffs every year?!? lol Better than getting dominated every regular season and watching the playoffs at home. Dirtbag59 01-16-2012, 06:23 PM What's that? Dominate the regular season only to lose in the playoffs every year?!? lol Hey better then failing in the regular season year after year after year. And as the Colts demonstrated during their time with Manning. As long as you continue to make the playoffs you have a chance to go all the way. Better than getting dominated every regular season and watching the playoffs at home. Nice SkinzWin 01-16-2012, 06:25 PM Hey better then failing in the regular season year after year after year. And as the Colts demonstrated during their time with Manning. As long as you continue to make the playoffs you have a chance to go all the way. Nice I know I'd rather be there too. Just messin'... but it does get frustrating to be in the playoffs and go nowhere each year. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum