The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Nothing. He is a unrestricted FA.

I guess a lot depends on GB getting Finley signed and GB using the franchise tag on Flynn. I just cant imagine GB letting Flynn go for nothing.

absolutely not. i'd be happy with taking blackmon at 6 if RG3 isnt there, and trading into the late 1st to get foles or tannehill, but absolutely not for a future 1st. id give up the 2nd and maybe a 4th or something. trading into the back end of the 1st shouldnt require a future 1st.

Doesn't require it but to jump from 38-40 to 20 might. So you would sit back and hope Tannehill is there at 38-40 (Which is doubtful with Matt "Charles" Barkley and Dawan LaRon Landry Jones Drew Bledsoe returning to school.) From what I see I think Foles COULD be the 2nd best QB in this draft but also has the highest bust potential in the draft at QB too.

Has anyone mentioned the possibility of acquiring TJ Yates?

Should we acquire TJ Yates??

Blackmon will be gone before 6 and Tannehill won't last beyond 12 IMO.

Blackmon will be gone before 6 and Tannehill won't last beyond 12 IMO.

So you just had to rain on my parade huh? And on Wild Card weekend too? For shame "Praying" Lotus.

Doesn't require it but to jump from 38-40 to 20 might. So you would sit back and hope Tannehill is there at 38-40 (Which is doubtful with Matt "Charles" Barkley and Dawan LaRon Landry Jones Drew Bledsoe returning to school.) From what I see I think Foles COULD be the 2nd best QB in this draft but also has the highest bust potential in the draft at QB too.

i wouldnt give up a future 1st for tannehill or foles, bottom line. neither of them are worth that kind of investment imo.

So you just had to rain on my parade huh? And on Wild Card weekend too? For shame "Praying" Lotus.

Sorry, my bad. :) I could be wrong. Just an opinion.

i wouldnt give up a future 1st for tannehill or foles, bottom line. neither of them are worth that kind of investment imo.

Neither would I but if we don't take him at 6-12 it could cost us that to get him. (Tannehill)

Neither would I but if we don't take him at 6-12 it could cost us that to get him. (Tannehill)

true, but i dont want us to overpay/reach for him. if we give up a future 1st, id rather give it up for RG3

I guess a lot depends on GB getting Finley signed and GB using the franchise tag on Flynn. I just cant imagine GB letting Flynn go for nothing.


This isn't like the Matt Cassell situation. Cassell took the team to a 11-5 record that year Brady went down, and was the only reason they franchised him so they could be protected in case Tom didn't come back healthy. Green Bay isn't going to guarantee him a 14mil salary by hitting him with the franchise tag. Also, no other team is going to pay him that type of salary either.