The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

If there was a real chance of us getting him, wouldnt we have scooped him up when the broncos released him?

If there was a real chance of us getting him, wouldnt we have scooped him up when the broncos released him?

maybe we didnt want to absorb his old contract for the remainder of the season

maybe we didnt want to absorb his old contract for the remainder of the season

gotcha. i thought once they are a free agent you didnt have to do that

http://nfltraderumors.co/browns-considering-qb-matt-flynn/

After careful consideration, I think I want Kyle Orton. Running to a meeting. Will explain more when I return

ugh...

It boils down to whether or not the Browns take Trent Richardson and move on with Colt McCoy and I think they will.

you think or you hope, LOL.


cause in my mind, the browns would be absolutely silly not to take RG3 with their first pick, and the best available blindside tackle for him with their second 1st rounder. Cleveland will also want to sign someone (Dwayne Bowe, Desean Jackson) to put out there with their future big time guy (Greg Little), so there are definitly pieces in place in Cleveland to look alot better starting next year, ESPECIALLY after they snag RG3, which, sorry to say........they will.

Cleveland will look alot better starting next year, trust me. With either a more seasoned McCoy with another season under his belt and renewed confidence when they don't pick RG3 and stick it out with him, or with RG3, and a FA WR to pair with Greg Little, and hopefully that blindside protector he needs that the browns dont currently have. Either way, they will come to play next year.

God Damn do I wish we had 2 first rounders.

But are the chiefs gonna take him instead of Cassel??? Living Colorado i've seen a lot of Orton. Good very servicable. Only problem he cant win games on his own. Needs either playmakers or a good system or a good defense.

Orton over Cassel? Doubt it.

Cassel signed a 6 year $60M deal in 2009, so I doubt they would want to eat that and in turn give a deal to Orton too.

I was on the Orton bandwagon as well. He would be a good vet to have until a rook is ready to play. And let's not even start with this silliness that he's no better than Grossman. He's been much better over his career at taking care of the ball. 80-57 TD to INT vs 56 TD to 60 INT for Rex.

ya, who the hell had that bandwagon in their sig, i know i was on it, considering our current lineup of Qbs on the roster

I was on the Orton bandwagon as well. He would be a good vet to have until a rook is ready to play. And let's not even start with this silliness that he's no better than Grossman. He's been much better over his career at taking care of the ball. 80-57 TD to INT vs 56 TD to 60 INT for Rex.

Depends on the rookie and how long he needs to get ready. If it's 4-6 weeks then fine...but If it's a rookie like Tannehill who may need a year+ to be ready then they need to do better then Orton.

Depends on the rookie and how long he needs to get ready. If it's 4-6 weeks then fine...but If it's a rookie like Tannehill who may need a year+ to be ready then they need to do better then Orton.

And that would be?