The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

I didn't say we couldn't draft one. I'm saying if you think RGIII or Luck could lead us to a SB just as Manning could. Why go for 3 years when you can go for 10-15?

Because it normally takes longer for a Young QB to become Elite , also Manning could be a great teacher for a Rookie QB. I just think its a good fit

Do you guys think we will know by the time draft day rolls around if he is 100% healthy? Do you think RGIII or Luck could lead us to multiple SB victories in the 10-15 years they would be here? Do you think Manning will sign with someone before the draft?

1) No. But we'll have a better idea of his health.
2) Yes.
3) Yes. I think Manning will sign with someone quickly. Hurt or not, he is Peyton Manning after all.

In other words, I would be happy with any of these outcomes:
A) Luck
B) RGIII
C) Manning + Tannehill

1) No. But we'll have a better idea of his health.
2) Yes.
3) Yes. I think Manning will sign with someone quickly. Hurt or not, he is Peyton Manning after all.

In other words, I would be happy with any of these outcomes:
A) Luck
B) RGIII
C) Manning + Tannehill


this

14 of 15 NFL scouts prefer Luck to Griffin III | ProFootballTalk (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/21/14-of-15-nfl-scouts-prefer-luck-to-griffin-iii/)

You mean how Manning taught all the QBs that have backed him up over the years? So you want Tannehill and Manning with Tannehill sitting 3 years? To hell with that. If we don't feel the guy on the board can start day one, I don't draft him. The days of "sitting and learning and grooming" and any other BS label we wanna put on it are coming to an end.

I feel Luck is safer with a higher floor than RGIII, ceiling wise I go with RGIII, but I would love either. I just think that later down the line RGIII will have the slight edge but I will go on record and say that both will win at least one Super Bowl.

You mean how Manning taught all the QBs that have backed him up over the years? So you want Tannehill and Manning with Tannehill sitting 3 years? To hell with that. If we don't feel the guy on the board can start day one, I don't draft him. The days of "sitting and learning and grooming" and any other BS label we wanna put on it are coming to an end.

Now come on. Aaron Rodgers sat and was groomed behind a terrible teacher as a starting QB. And Rodgers is hardly a relic of a dead past.

Having the greatest QB ever to play the game start while we have a hot shot youngster learning the ropes sounds like a great plan to me. It's not the only possible plan but it is a good one.

You mean how Manning taught all the QBs that have backed him up over the years? So you want Tannehill and Manning with Tannehill sitting 3 years? To hell with that. If we don't feel the guy on the board can start day one, I don't draft him. The days of "sitting and learning and grooming" and any other BS label we wanna put on it are coming to an end.


Well A.Rodgers sat, Matt Flynn (Hot FA QB) sat. I'm JS it could work. Honestly I'd take Manning over any QB if healthy for the next 3 years over anyone but Luck

I feel Luck is safer with a higher floor than RGIII, ceiling wise I go with RGIII, but I would love either. I just think that later down the line RGIII will have the slight edge but I will go on record and say that both will win at least one Super Bowl.


One is almost certain to turn out just Average, history and numbers for 1st round QBs show that so I'll say only 1 will win a title