Would you consider trading Orakpo and Trent Williams for picks?

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9

Paintrain
12-29-2011, 07:25 PM
I know the offseason is fast approaching when the madden trade schemes are own the rise.

This. So much this.

Dirtbag59
12-29-2011, 07:27 PM
Orakpo, maybe a first definitely a second and either another second or a third.

Williams, pre-pot a 2nd and 4th, post-pot 3rd.

You're crazy. The asking price for a franchise LT has been set as a late first round pick. As seen in the Jason Peters trade.

SBXVII
12-29-2011, 07:45 PM
You're crazy. The asking price for a franchise LT has been set as a late first round pick. As seen in the Jason Peters trade.

Now account for pot smoking (-1 or -2 rounds) and you get as the other poster suggested a 2nd to 4th round for TW. :)

skinsfaninok
12-29-2011, 08:05 PM
Some on here must b smoking what Trent has to think Willie Smith is better than him
Do u guys watch football

SirClintonPortis
12-29-2011, 08:08 PM
Now account for pot smoking (-1 or -2 rounds) and you get as the other poster suggested a 2nd to 4th round for TW. :)

4th rounders average out to special teamers or solid starters with little potential to even make the Pro-Bowl. You'd be ****ing stupid to give out a 4th.

Lotus
12-29-2011, 08:30 PM
4th rounders average out to special teamers or solid starters with little potential to even make the Pro-Bowl. You'd be ****ing stupid to give out a 4th.

This.

You don't accept less than a first for Rak. You don't accept less than a high second plus something else valuable for TW, and that's including the weed-smoking discount.

Trading TW and/or Rak for someone like Luck is one thing. But it is baffling how some folks in this thread want to give away our best players for almost nothing.

Dirtbag59
12-29-2011, 08:33 PM
Now account for pot smoking (-1 or -2 rounds) and you get as the other poster suggested a 2nd to 4th round for TW. :)

Talent would win out over concerns of marijuana use. The Redskins wouldn't be trying to send a message like the Steelers did with Santonio Holmes. If they were to trade Trent in the near future they would try to get full value which as I mentioned before would amount to a late first early 2nd. Of course all of this trade talk is a moot point .

SirClintonPortis
12-29-2011, 09:18 PM
Talent would win out over concerns of marijuana use. The Redskins wouldn't be trying to send a message like the Steelers did with Santonio Holmes. If they were to trade Trent in the near future they would try to get full value which as I mentioned before would amount to a late first early 2nd. Of course all of this trade talk is a moot point .

Well, it's also easier when the then-#3 WR was Mike Wallace and they banked on him being capable of becoming a #1 for them. ;)

Carnage
12-29-2011, 09:49 PM
I'm surprised no one has mentioned that Trent Williams was a top 5 pick under the old system, and only 2 years into his deal. Were we to trade him, we would have to pay his entire bonus, and lose that cap space. Even if he doesnt play, I think we cant afford to move him anytime soon. Plus he is one failed drug test away from being suspended for a season, so I would be incredibly surprised if anyone offered much of anything for him. Finally, this is an O-line rich draft. Teams can just use their picks on players that are not subject to suspension.

SkinzWin
12-29-2011, 09:53 PM
This.

You don't accept less than a first for Rak. You don't accept less than a high second plus something else valuable for TW, and that's including the weed-smoking discount.

Trading TW and/or Rak for someone like Luck is one thing. But it is baffling how some folks in this thread want to give away our best players for almost nothing.

I think you'd be stupid to trade Rak for anything. He is one of the cornerstones of this team. Nope.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum