MTK
01-25-2005, 05:08 PM
So much can and will change from now until draft day, everything now is pure speculation.
Redskins have dinner with WR Troy WilliamsonMTK 01-25-2005, 05:08 PM So much can and will change from now until draft day, everything now is pure speculation. SkinsRock 01-25-2005, 05:48 PM So much can and will change from now until draft day, everything now is pure speculation. Exactly. Last year at this time, a lot of people had us picking a RB early...no one had a clue about the Portis/Bailey trade, which affected both teams' draft. Not saying the Redskins will be quite a splashy with their moves (I really don't think we will be), but the draft is nearly impossible to predict until after free agency really gets going. Then, everyone gets a much better idea as to who needs what, not to mention draft picks being traded for players. Shane 01-25-2005, 06:41 PM From ESPN Insider - Scouts Inc.: 14. Carolina Panthers (7-9) Troy Williamson* | WR | South Carolina If the Panthers get Steve Smith back healthy and are able to re-sign Muhsin Muhammad before he becomes a free agent, wide receiver will no longer be a pressing need. However, if the team loses Muhammad, which is a likely scenario, drafting a big-play, vertical threat like Williamson would be a great value. Williamson is an underrated prospect right now because people haven't evaluated the underclassmen as much to this point. Once the 6-2, 205-pound playmaker runs a 4.4 during postseason workouts, his draft stock will skyrocket. 4. Chicago Bears (5-11) Braylon Edwards | WR | Michigan The Bears desperately need a wide receiver who can stretch the field vertically, and Edwards is the best this class has to offer. Some think the Bears will shy away from using another top pick on a Michigan wide receiver, but that theory is ridiculous. For starters, the current regime wasn't in place when the Bears drafted David Terrell. Secondly, Edwards is bigger and faster than Terrell and made far more big plays at the collegiate level than Terrell did. In our opinion, Edwards is the best receiver in this year's draft and has elite NFL potential. 12. San Diego Chargers (12-4) Mike Williams | WR | USC Despite their impressive turnaround in 2004, the Chargers still have several positions of need to address. With two picks in the first round (12 and 28), the team can either elect to package the two to move up or stay put and add two quality first-round youngsters. If it's the latter, drafting a dynamic wide receiver like Williams here would be awfully tempting. Williams doesn't have great speed and has been out of football for a year, but he is big enough and athletic enough to develop into a vertical threat. Adding a playmaker like Williams to go along with TE Antonio Gates and RB LaDainian Tomlinson would make the Chargers' offense frightening to match up against no matter the signal-caller. Shane 01-25-2005, 06:48 PM The Sporting News Draft Watch: Top underclassmen Top underclassmen prospects Marion Barber III, 5-11/215, RB, Minnesota. Is a gifted runner with vision and power who could sneak into the bottom of the first round. Isn't a burner. Has good hands and also can return punts. Darryl Blackstock, 6-3/240, LB, Virginia. Is a playmaker best suited as an outside linebacker in a 3-4 defense but also could be a middle 'backer in a 4-3 or an end in an up-the-field 4-3 scheme. Is a good pass rusher who also can run and cover. Channing Crowder, 6-3/241, LB, Florida. Is an old-school linebacker who plays big. Is instinctive and athletic. Is ideal at middle linebacker, and teams also will consider him as an outside 'backer. Thomas Davis, 6-1/220, S, Georgia. Is a fast, aggressive, physical prospect. Has good measurables with a feel for the position. Is tough. Adam Jones, 5-10/190, CB, West Virginia. Is a playmaker with excellent speed and quickness. Has ball skills. Plays taller than he is. Shawne Merriman, 6-4/253, DE, Maryland. Would be perfect as an outside 'backer in a 3-4. Is small for an end. Has raw tools and can pass rush. Heath Miller, 6-5/255, TE, Virginia. Draft's top tight end prospect has a nice blend of receiving and blocking skills. Shows good effort as a blocker. Justin Miller, 5-11/200, CB, Clemson. Is a strong, explosive corner who can play man or zone. Has the speed to run with top receivers. Is a little inconsistent. Also is a fine return man. Vernand Morency, 5-10/215, RB, Oklahoma State. Fast, powerful runner hits the hole hard. Has the body to be a workhorse. Bounces off tacklers. Brodney Pool, 6-2/200, S, Oklahoma. Active and instinctive playmaker who stands out on a great team. Is smart and tough. Has decent speed. Aaron Rodgers, 6-2/210, QB, California. Has good velocity and solid mechanics. Makes good decisions. Played in a quarterback-friendly system. Could be the first player selected. Alex Smith, 6-4/210, QB, Utah. Is a very smart passer who makes good decisions. Has top intangibles. Is an accurate thrower. Might not have the raw skills and arm strength of some top quarterbacks. Justin Tuck, 6-5/255, DE, Notre Dame. Has good body control and is explosive. Productive sack artist has the strength to play the run. Mike Williams, 6-5/230, WR, USC. Sat out a year, which could hurt him. Great athlete has soft hands and makes circus catches. Lacks top speed. Troy Williamson, 6-2/200, WR, South Carolina. Speedster has great body control and hands. Makes a lot of plays. Is put together well. Shane 01-25-2005, 06:49 PM The Sporting News Draft Watch: Top underclassmen They list two wide receivers as "Top underclassmen prospects" Mike Williams, 6-5/230, WR, USC. Sat out a year, which could hurt him. Great athlete has soft hands and makes circus catches. Lacks top speed. Troy Williamson, 6-2/200, WR, South Carolina. Speedster has great body control and hands. Makes a lot of plays. Is put together well. shallyshal 01-25-2005, 08:22 PM IMHO taking this fellow at #9 would be way too high. he reminds me some of ashley lelie, the denver wideout. he has turned into a fine wideout, but it has taken him the better part of 2 years to get there. taking him that high in this draft is foolish because he will not be productive for this team next year. much better to take a wideout a bit later in the draft. there will be guys in rounds 3-4 who could help us just as much as this guy will next year. besides, i would far prefer to grab someone like givens, who will be a free agent after this year if the pats do not resign him. with all the depth they have at wideout (branch, patton, troy brown, bethel johnson and givens) someone of quality is going to get released. patton is cheap. brown can play corner and returns for them. branch has amazing speed as does bethel johnson. givens could be the odd man out. if so, someone is going to get a bigtime receiver. did you all hear this stat on him?? in his entire college/pro career he has NEVER lost a fumble. that has joe gibbs written all over it. while we are at it, the only receiver i could see the skins taking at #9 would be mike williams. that is a guy who WILL be productive next year. Shane 01-25-2005, 08:43 PM One of the things about Williamson I like is his speed. Having Ramsey as your quarterback means you want guys to be able to get downfield fast to take full advantage of his strong arm. Williamson has good hands I have read and he has excellent body control - so he isn't just a converted track star. Furthermore, going against top cornerbacks - he has dominated them it is reported. With Mike Williams you have another terrific prospect, but does he fit with the Redskins best? We need the downfield dimension, - a new "downtown Charlie Brown" and Williams' talents are better in other areas it seems. With Braylon Edwards, I would think it is pretty likely we would have to trade up to draft him. MTK 01-25-2005, 08:56 PM Exactly. Last year at this time, a lot of people had us picking a RB early...no one had a clue about the Portis/Bailey trade, which affected both teams' draft. Not saying the Redskins will be quite a splashy with their moves (I really don't think we will be), but the draft is nearly impossible to predict until after free agency really gets going. Then, everyone gets a much better idea as to who needs what, not to mention draft picks being traded for players. good point, free agency can change everything jrocx69 01-25-2005, 09:52 PM IMHO taking this fellow at #9 would be way too high. he reminds me some of ashley lelie, the denver wideout. he has turned into a fine wideout, but it has taken him the better part of 2 years to get there. taking him that high in this draft is foolish because he will not be productive for this team next year. much better to take a wideout a bit later in the draft. there will be guys in rounds 3-4 who could help us just as much as this guy will next year. besides, i would far prefer to grab someone like givens, who will be a free agent after this year if the pats do not resign him. with all the depth they have at wideout (branch, patton, troy brown, bethel johnson and givens) someone of quality is going to get released. patton is cheap. brown can play corner and returns for them. branch has amazing speed as does bethel johnson. givens could be the odd man out. if so, someone is going to get a bigtime receiver. did you all hear this stat on him?? in his entire college/pro career he has NEVER lost a fumble. that has joe gibbs written all over it. while we are at it, the only receiver i could see the skins taking at #9 would be mike williams. that is a guy who WILL be productive next year. your not understanding the purpose of having this guy... he will be great for stretching the D, with 4.3 speed and good hands, rookie or not, the D will have to pay attention to him. meaning the FS is gonna slide over and play deep. and thats great, we made more of an opening for portis... get it? no one respected our wr's last year, and no one will this year... we need that caliber player to help us out with that (and gibbs calling more deep routes). Stretching the opposing D is what portis needs. you just dont see alot of speed and hands combination unless they are drafted in round 1. so anyway, i love the idea, yet i still want a DE. we pass them up every year and go to the FA market. WE NEED TO GROOM OUR OWN DAMN DE. AND I LOVE POLLACK OR JUSTIN TUCK. they can really make a difference for us against mcnabb for two games and we play atlanta next year as well, which i think would help considerably vs vick GoSkins! 01-25-2005, 10:39 PM your not understanding the purpose of having this guy... he will be great for stretching the D, with 4.3 speed and good hands, rookie or not, the D will have to pay attention to him. meaning the FS is gonna slide over and play deep. and thats great, we made more of an opening for portis... get it? no one respected our wr's last year, and no one will this year... we need that caliber player to help us out with that (and gibbs calling more deep routes). Stretching the opposing D is what portis needs. you just dont see alot of speed and hands combination unless they are drafted in round 1. I have to agree with that. Having a speedster will help with stretching the d. Short passing routes and the running game will be more productive. Think of how many tackles Shawn Taylor made against the run last year. He did it because he didn't have to play deep very often (thanks to our corners). We need to take opposing safteys away from the line of scrimmage. Imagine... Coles, Williamson, Jacobs, Thrash in a 4 receiver set. Now send them deep and pass to Portis (with a step) one on one against an LB. Talk about room to run.... |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum