The Big Rumor: If The Colts Take Luck, Then Manning Could Be...Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
[9]
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
diehard 12-25-2011, 09:29 PM Well keep in mind who the Jets have added Tom Moore to be at New York Jets' facility rest of season - ESPN New York (http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/story/_/id/7328592/tom-moore-new-york-jets-facility-rest-season) Now you're starting to make sense. Meks 12-25-2011, 09:59 PM Indeed ^ GTripp0012 12-26-2011, 02:27 AM It's blasphemous I know. But I'd take Sanchez over RG3. Give me Bradford over bothWeird. Whatever happened to go big or go home? SirClintonPortis 12-26-2011, 04:36 AM It is clear we are in desperate need of a QB. A franchsie Qb. But I am not in favor of giving up a ton of draft picks/our future to get a particular media darling (Luck/RGIII). In the end it is still a crap shot as to which of the Qb's will star. I am not in favor of firing Shanahan only because I do not want to start all over again. Allen and Shanahan have done some mostly good FO work by improving our offensive line and tearing apart our defense and rebuliing it. They have made mistakes, Josh Wilson for Carlos Rodger for example. But nobody is perfect and all team make some mistakes. We need to stay the course, let Allen/Shanahan finish what they started. At least one more year. I feel we are one great QB, two good CB's, one RB and one WR away from being a playoff team. Compared to when Zorn left, that is not htat much. The teams ahead of us in our division Giants and Dallas are not that much better than us. No need to blow everything up. We never would have gotten the Carlos Rogers in San Francisco even if we kept him. Why? Because he would have gotten a gigantic check and thus "confirm" that he had nothing significant to improve in his game. diehard 12-26-2011, 05:58 AM We never would have gotten the Carlos Rogers in San Francisco even if we kept him. Why? Because he would have gotten a gigantic check and thus "confirm" that he had nothing significant to improve in his game. Thank You. CultBrennan59 12-26-2011, 10:49 AM Instead of starting a new thread: Jay Glazer said that reportedly the asking price for Andrew Luck is going to be 3 first round picks. Would you do that? (Now 3 first rounders could be your 1st in 2012, 2014, 2016; it doesn't mean 2012,2013,2014) T.O.Killa 12-26-2011, 10:50 AM It's blasphemous I know. But I'd take Sanchez over RG3. Give me Bradford over both Why would you rather have Sanchez over RG3. From what I have seen he has all the tools and seems to be a very smart guy. KI Skins Fan 12-26-2011, 11:14 AM Instead of starting a new thread: Jay Glazer said that reportedly the asking price for Andrew Luck is going to be 3 first round picks. Would you do that? (Now 3 first rounders could be your 1st in 2012, 2014, 2016; it doesn't mean 2012,2013,2014) Yes! Andrew Luck is The Truth! redsk1 12-26-2011, 11:37 AM Instead of starting a new thread: Jay Glazer said that reportedly the asking price for Andrew Luck is going to be 3 first round picks. Would you do that? (Now 3 first rounders could be your 1st in 2012, 2014, 2016; it doesn't mean 2012,2013,2014) You are switching 2012 1st round picks, so essentially 2 other 1st rounders. SmootSmack 12-26-2011, 11:45 AM Start a different thread on what is Andrew Luck worth | |
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum