Trully lets analyize this...

Its a long offseason and so I had an idea how about we go through the roster of are high profile players and potiential additions to the team and analyze the impact that they have on our team. Are these players better as skins or trade bait. lets discuss.

The first player I want to discuss is Fred Smoot. He stats are the following:
DEFENSIVE STATS

Year Team G Total Tckl Ast Sacks Int Yds Avg Lg TD Pass Def
2001 Washington Redskins 14 33 30.0 3 0 5 36 7.2 36 0 7
2002 Washington Redskins 16 61 49.0 12 0 4 12 3.0 12 0 10
2003 Washington Redskins 15 57 50.0 7 0 4 35 8.8 35 0 5
2004 Washington Redskins 15 59 53.0 6 0 3 17 5.7 17 0 10
TOTAL 60 210 182.0 28 0 16 100 6.2 36 0 32




we'll he seems to miss atleast one game a year, he a good tackler after his rookie season he averaged in the 50's although no sacks. his int's have gone down over the years this is not neccarily a bad thing teams may have more respect for him. or then agian he may just be getting caught on. when he get the ball he doesn't score that kinda badd because in today's NFL defenses have to put up points as well.

Looking past stats if u've seen a skin game u know he plays his heart out and leaves it all on the field. he plays hurt, and enjoys being part of the defense. he's beginnning to be respected so his trade value may be pretty high. so what do you guys think should he stay, go let it be known.

As for my opinion although I love smoot and the way he plays I would not be devistated if we used him in a deal to bring in some good talent.; ie Moss in a package deal with gardner and picks, rather than giving up Lavar. there seems to be alot of corners who want to move this year and I think we could get an equal deal like Samari Rolle or Charles Woodson. I know alot of you may say "Woodson he injury prone" we'll I say in rebuttle to that they same thing about shawn springs last year and did very well as a skin. but anyways post what u think.

I still think if we let Smoot go its gonna hurt us. If you won't give Smoot his money then do you realy think we will give Mr. Woodson and the Poston Bros. his money no. Rolle has never really impressed me for a season. He has his couple of flashes a year, but thats it. I honestly wouldn't mind a Moss deal though if its equal. I think Moss just needs to get out of Minn. I don't know about you all but, L. Coles and R. Moss, w/ C. Coolley at H-Back/TE, and C. Portis at HB, with P. Ramsey at Qb. Super Nice!!!

i agree thats two number 1 recievers and h-back who should of went to the pro-bowl based on Numbers also a pro bowl half back the line would just have to do their job.

you guys are retarded, no moss, garbage for the league

and the people who like them, are definitely not true fans of the nfl.... guaranteed

you guys are retarded, no moss, garbage for the league

and the people who like them, are definitely not true fans of the nfl.... guaranteed

:rofl: are u serious, Moss never said he's bigger than the league, the media did. So what ur opinion of TO, or Chad Johnson, joe horn. I 've seen interviews where they all talked trash but the media choose not to respond to them as much as Moss. Wideouts are like cb's they are very confident and talk.
oooo wait maybe it's because moss dicked the great Greenbay team and beat farve the nfl god in the field owned by the fans... get real!! people have personalities, there not robots, and there are some assholes out there. either way no one can stop moss one-on-one period.
If there has been someone tell me who it is. If he was a skin he would free up coles, portis,and cooley. Teams are looking for a player of his caliber in the draft ie, mike williams. but you know he's the proven real deal, taught by cris carter, and virtually unstoppable so think before ya speak dog. :httr:

I'm not saying that Randy Moss is a bad player, but what I AM saying is that he wouldn't be worth the price to bring to Washington. Not only would it cost us SO many players/picks/money, we can win just as easily without him.

Bringing Randy Moss in alone would shake up the continuity that Gibbs said he wanted to maintain in the offseason by having to release major players and give up picks, not to mention the attitude he brings, for the good and the bad.

I'm all for Moss when you take the financial stuff out of the question. If we can afford him and don't have to give up franchise players, I'm all for it.

I would cautiously agree, even though it wouldn't be possible to get him with money alone.

but we've side tracked away from the point, what do we do with smoot?

Resign,resign,resign... I know that pretty much everyone has written him off and I just have this gut feeling that he'll be back.

I also had a gut feeling we'd be in the NFC Playoff game before. ;)