CrustyRedskin
11-29-2011, 02:13 PM
He's basically been JaMarcus Russell through two seasons.
I'm not saying that better times aren't in the future for Sam Bradford. He does a lot of "NFL things" really well already. But Bradford, at his best, has a long way to go to even be competent. He's going to need a lot of help really fast. Which is something that the Rams (and to be fair, the Redskins) vastly underestimated on draft day.
If i had to rate your +14,000 posts, I'd say this is your lowest moment. :insane: lol, Just kiddin GTripp!!
GTripp0012
11-29-2011, 02:17 PM
Bradford could eventually be a bust but the Russell analogy was a poor choice. Russell looked out of shape, lost and ill prepared in every game he ever played in. Bradford has already had a better career then Russell did.As judged by talent scouts? Perhaps you're right. As judged by statistics, division titles, playoff wins, comeback victories? Not so much.
Look, I thought Bradford would be a solid starter coming out of OU. I thought Russell would be a bust coming out of LSU. Was I right on Russell? Probably. Was I right on Bradford? It's not looking good, but there's still a shot that I was. Point is, I have no reason to root against Sam Bradford, but when in two seasons, the only two names who have performed worse than you are a rookie Jimmy Clausen and a rookie Blaine Gabbert, and a horrible Curtis Painter, well, that's definitely not worth ignoring, right?
GTripp0012
11-29-2011, 02:18 PM
If i had to rate your 14,00 + posts, I'd say this is your lowest moment,Duly noted. We will all reflect on this moment in five years as a low point in Warpath history.
EARTHQUAKE2689
11-29-2011, 02:20 PM
Not just warpath. Many fans say the same thing, which is exactly why he was saying it. To mock them.
I know he was.
CrustyRedskin
11-29-2011, 02:24 PM
Duly noted. We will all reflect on this moment in five years as a low point in Warpath history.
LOL!! But my posts on the other hand bring nothing but pure non biased journalism to the table of top notch caliber, inwhich everyone agrees on.
GTripp0012
11-29-2011, 02:26 PM
Why was his race even mentioned? It's obvious from his weight and off-season habits he had no desire to get better at his craft. Three years after he was drafted #1, and he can't even sniff a chance at a roster spot even now at his young age. The below should give you some understanding on JR's character.
“Life coach” fires JaMarcus Russell | ProFootballTalk (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/14/life-coach-fires-jamarcus-russell/)Nothing about JaMarcus Russell's character should be obvious to us. The very end of his NFL career was a total train wreck. A very rare train wreck, I might add. A lot of people wrote a lot of terrible things about him and then there was the whole citation for codeine that made him untouchable.
I do think it's fair to criticize his work habits. I don't think it's fair to cite his desire or character as a defense for Sam Bradford.
REDSKINS4ever
11-30-2011, 07:38 AM
It's still too soon to say whether or not the 2010 draft class is great or terrible. Clausen is the only QB from that draft class that's seemingly a bust. Sam Bradford, Tim Tebow, and Colt McCoy all possess the potential to be great. All they need around them is play makers.
sportscurmudgeon
11-30-2011, 05:34 PM
I cannot believe that everyone here has missed the hidden gems of the 2010 QB class. Two QBs were taken in the fifth round:
1. John Skelton - - now starting for the Arizona "Bleeping" Cardinals - - and - -
2. Jonathon Crompton.
And you folks believe this draft class might be "historically awful"? :pffff:
SirClintonPortis
11-30-2011, 07:25 PM
They have to outdo 2007's QB class first. ;)