kipers first mock draft

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5

skinsfanthru&thru
01-18-2005, 06:11 PM
does anyone know when underclassmen have until to change their minds and remove their names from the draft?

gibbsisgod
01-18-2005, 06:58 PM
The drops scare. I would rather trade down and get a WR and another pick. im startin to beleive this is our best option

BIGREDSKINFAN63
01-18-2005, 07:20 PM
i would rather see the skins get the wr from usc that had to sit out last year,mike williams.

Daseal
01-18-2005, 07:33 PM
Mike Williams would lose to Ramsey in a 40 yard dash. That's my biggest beef with him.

itvnetop
01-18-2005, 07:59 PM
williams ran a 4.56 for scouts last year... while no means a burner, it's fast enough for a 6-5 stud with a 37" vertical. if he falls to us at 9, draft him and don't look back.

SKINSnCANES
01-18-2005, 08:13 PM
yea I used to always use opera to paste insider articles.

Id much rather have mike williams, in a heart beat. Edwards is rod gardner in my mind, same guy, great potential, protype receiver. Mike williams makes plays though, and hes 6'5", a plaxico burress type guy. Hopefully hes been working on his speed, I think he can make big plays either way. Coles can then be our deep threat again

SASpen00XIII
01-18-2005, 08:40 PM
I'd rather have Edwards over Williams if the team is looking to draft a WR. The Insider Scouts.com reported that Williams has attitude problems and weight gain issues like Dave Boston (hopefully not the piercing problems though). Not to mention the whole year off thing. The Skins need WR help now, go with Edwards.

TheMalcolmConnection
01-18-2005, 08:42 PM
Definitely, I'm ready to see Coles by the deep threat he used to be. I'm wondering whether or not he SHOULD get surgery, because I know they are recommending it.

TheMalcolmConnection
01-18-2005, 08:43 PM
Part of me too is wondering if WR is as much a pressing need as simply retooling the offense a bit to accomodate the talent we DO have.

kingerock
01-18-2005, 08:46 PM
I like Williams size. 6'5" and 230 matches up well in our division vs the DBs who would be covering him. We wouldn't need to trade down though, get a DE in FA and a TE in round 3 or 4 as there are alot of decent prospects that should drop to the 3rd round that would fit our system well. If we do trade down, I get a WR and a Guard in the 1st and 2nd rounds.

The other school of thought (for me) is trade up to get Dan Cody and go after a WR in FA. I wouldn't do that though as I would move Arrington to DE and consentrate on getting a vertical threat WR and beefing up the offensive line with a guard and center.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum