artmonkforhallofamein07
12-08-2011, 10:49 PM
Just googled whay you were talking about. This kind of speculation does not really seem that out of whack. We are always going to be connected to these kinds of rumors.
2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
[48]
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
artmonkforhallofamein07 12-08-2011, 10:49 PM Just googled whay you were talking about. This kind of speculation does not really seem that out of whack. We are always going to be connected to these kinds of rumors. EARTHQUAKE2689 12-08-2011, 10:53 PM yeah i called it a blog recently, I think by definition it is. Ive always thought a forum to which encourages sharing of opinions by anyone who wants to participate was a blog...i mean if it is not what is it? you act like by saying "blog" it is derogatory, I've never thought that. It's not a blog at all. It's a message board. Chico23231 12-08-2011, 10:58 PM It's a forum, or message board. Internet forum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_board) Blog - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog) word up on the education. yeah, thought the terms blog, forum, message board were basically synonymous. obviously not, thanks 30gut 12-09-2011, 12:00 AM Who besides Luck and maybe Barkley are said to be instant starters at the pro level?No offense, but the thought that people consider any QB prospect an instant starter at a pro-bowl level is patently absurd. But there are some good prospects in this class. I guess you're asking about pro-ready prospects that could start at some point in their rookie year? You already mentioned Luck and Barkley. Even though Griff, Weeden come from a spread I think they could start too. Tannehill could also because of the system familiarity from his college offense. skinsfaninok 12-09-2011, 12:04 AM RG3 See's the white girls coming up lol Ok JK anyways On the field he's a big time QB waiting to happen SFREDSKIN 12-09-2011, 12:06 AM No offense, but the thought that people consider any QB prospect an instant starter at a pro-bowl level is patently absurd. I'm sure you've heard of Cam Newton and Andy Dalton? Luck, Barkley and possibly RGIII could be just as good or better next year. skinsfaninok 12-09-2011, 12:18 AM Cam Newton is a Freak of nature, Luck is the only QB I'd take over Cam in this draft diehard 12-09-2011, 02:12 AM yeah i called it a blog recently, I think by definition it is. Ive always thought a forum to which encourages sharing of opinions by anyone who wants to participate was a blog...i mean if it is not what is it? you act like by saying "blog" it is derogatory, I've never thought that. I noticed that Chico' but, I know what you meant. diehard 12-09-2011, 02:14 AM Cam Newton is a Freak of nature, Luck is the only QB I'd take over Cam in this draft That's a strong statement. Hmmm. skinsfaninok 12-09-2011, 07:06 AM @ diehard Have u seen cam play this season? Big time deep ball accuracy, obviously runs the ball better than any QB other than Vick and has way better accuracy than most thought. He'll be around for a LONG time | |
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum