EARTHQUAKE2689
12-05-2011, 07:54 PM
308/446 69.1% 3528 yards 39 TDs 7 INTs
261/373 70% 3170 yards 35 TDs 9 INTs
These are the season's stats for two QBs, both in the Pac-12. You may be surprised as to which one is which.
Andrew Luck with the 70% and Barkley with the more TDs and ints
EARTHQUAKE2689
12-05-2011, 07:56 PM
Idk Richardson wouldn't be my first choice. I say if no QB or no guard either Claiborne or Vontae Burfect. Both are defensive beasts and would be studs in our defense.
Passing on a talent like Richardson if no qbs are on the board could be like passing on Peterson for Landry. Richardson is a monster and while I love Helu and think he will be a great running back, Trent Richardson will be a special player.
mauiRedskinbarn
12-05-2011, 07:59 PM
We need a QB so bad I say we go QB in round one and QB in round 5-7 for insurance
Like we did when we got Heath Shular and Good ol Gus F back in the day.
I vote RGIII in round 1 and either Austin Parish or Ryan Lindley in round 5 or 6
Hell I wouldn't be opposed to getting RGIII in round one and Tannehill in round 2 and have them battle for the job Shanahan style
EARTHQUAKE2689
12-05-2011, 08:03 PM
We need a QB so bad I say we go QB in round one and QB in round 5-7 for insurance
Like we did when we got Heath Shular and Good ol Gus F back in the day.
I vote RGIII in round 1 and either Austin Parish or Ryan Lindley in round 5 or 6
Hell I wouldn't be opposed to getting RGIII in round one and Tannehill in round 2 and have them battle for the job Shanahan style
I would break Shanny's arms if he went RGIII in rd 1 then Tannehill in rd 2
itvnetop
12-05-2011, 08:09 PM
Andrew Luck with the 70% and Barkley with the more TDs and ints
Um, you may want to check those stats again. The guy with more TDs has less INTs than the other guy.
EARTHQUAKE2689
12-05-2011, 08:11 PM
Um, you may want to check those stats again. The guy with more TDs has less INTs than the other guy.
my bad wasnt paying attention but Barkley with the more tds fewer picks and luck with the 70% comp.
SkinzWin
12-05-2011, 08:18 PM
I think we should draft Barkley 5th overall, and trade up to 7th to draft RGIII as an insurance policy. We can trade whichever one doesn't do as well like Philly has been doing with their second QB's.... :)
itvnetop
12-05-2011, 08:26 PM
Bark's now been snubbed for a Heisman finalist invite... with superior numbers over Luck (except for a completion percentage less than 1 percent lower), this may be one more reason he'd stay. Heisman, Natty, 2013 overall #1. Going for the Cam Newton triple.
Or take the money now and get to DC, please.
T.O.Killa
12-05-2011, 09:00 PM
I would break Shanny's arms if he went RGIII in rd 1 then Tannehill in rd 2
Don't worry he wont. What I would like to see is Shanny to get someone like Mat Moore or Mat Flynn, and Barkley or RGIII or who ever he rally wants, in the first round. I like Nick Foles as my back up to Barkley, but I think Shannahan will make a good choice drafting a QB. So I will trust in his choice, especialy after seeing Gabbert. I know he was not ready to be in a pro system, but they said the same thing about Newton.
EARTHQUAKE2689
12-05-2011, 09:25 PM
Don't worry he wont. What I would like to see is Shanny to get someone like Mat Moore or Mat Flynn, and Barkley or RGIII or who ever he rally wants, in the first round. I like Nick Foles as my back up to Barkley, but I think Shannahan will make a good choice drafting a QB. So I will trust in his choice, especialy after seeing Gabbert. I know he was not ready to be in a pro system, but they said the same thing about Newton.
I know he won't.