2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)


Paintrain
11-29-2011, 02:39 PM
I guess I could see them drafting an O lineman since the O line is terrible.

Hate to break it to you but the O line probably is intact for 2012. Williams is locked in, Shanny loves Liechtenstieger, Montgomery has played well enough to return as a starter, Chester and Brown got long term deals this past offseason. O-line starters won't be a priority. Depth will be a focus though.

skinsfaninok
11-29-2011, 02:55 PM
skins will finish 6-10 IMO and have the 9th pick

Beat NYJ and MIN

SBXVII
11-29-2011, 03:11 PM
IDK where u heard that but that is 100% Wrong

I'm not meaning "not happy" as in they will cut him bad not happy. I'm talking he's good but not awsome and recently injured. I could see them taking a QB. Doubtful but with the Rookie CAP they would have 2 really good QB's to choose from and play the best of the two.

My scenerio is just as crazy as the people who think if the QB's we want are not available then we should just trade with the Rams for Bradford. What makes people think the Rams will trade him? Same with Rivers? I keep hearing how, again, if the QB we want are not available the Skins should make a play for Rivers.

skinsfaninok
11-29-2011, 03:14 PM
I gotcha SB, and I'd give SD our 2nd rounder for Rivers

freddyg12
11-29-2011, 03:25 PM
Hate to break it to you but the O line probably is intact for 2012. Williams is locked in, Shanny loves Liechtenstieger, Montgomery has played well enough to return as a starter, Chester and Brown got long term deals this past offseason. O-line starters won't be a priority. Depth will be a focus though.

Allen's contracts so far all have given flexibility to the team to cut players w/out much accelerated cap $. I agree, depth will be a focus, but I wouldn't be surprised to see any O line position taken as early as the 2nd. At some point depth is competition for starting jobs.

I think C would be the first spot to upgrade, but it will come down to who's available. Other than Williams I don't see anyone's job there being established by any means. I hope Hurt can improve a lot, I don't see Cook here next year.

The Goat
11-29-2011, 03:28 PM
There's a good chance that we'll be picking fifth at 5-11 with just Indianapolis, Carolina, St. Louis, and Minnesota picking ahead of us. After Luck goes first, two of those teams won't even entertain the thought of picking a QB, and the other, St. Louis, is still very tied to Bradford no matter what they decide to do. The Redskins are well positioned to be able to draft the best of the rest.

I see the logic to this however it's (always) difficult to determine if/when another team will trade up. I could easily see Carolina, St. Louis and/or Minn looking for a trade down scenario...

T.O.Killa
11-29-2011, 03:49 PM
The only way the Redskins get Barkley in this senario is to trade up and it will cost next years number one at the minimum. The Browns have the advantage of having two number one's, in this upcoming draft.

GTripp0012
11-29-2011, 04:18 PM
A good (stats heavy) one from FO's Vince Verhei. ESPN Insider required:

With the makings of a solid D, Washington needs to find playmakers on offense - NFL - ESPN (http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7293860/with-makings-solid-d-washington-needs-find-playmakers-offense-nfl?addata=2009_insdr_mod_nfl_xxx_xxx)

Dirtbag59
11-29-2011, 04:22 PM
Remember last year when we thought Newton would definitely fall to 10? Yeah I'm starting to get skeptical of these guys that say Barkley will be around at 8. Lets just assume he's going around 2 or 3 via trade.

GTripp0012
11-29-2011, 04:24 PM
I think it's pretty critical to get a pass catcher and a passer with the first two picks. That pass catcher can play any position. Yes, even tight end. Just the best available guy who can help the offense.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum