2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)

I keep seeing people saying we need to address the O-line. I think our starting Oline is pretty solid. Maybe we need one more piece to the puzzle, but

T. Williams
K. Lich
Montgomery
Chester
Brown

I think they are doing a solid job this year till a few got hurt, and our depth seems okay. I would maybe work to get a stronger RT but that's it.


Our line is actually solid it's not great but its better than AVG.. Our problem is we have NO QB and NO WRs lol if Wrs cant get open its hard to block all game.

We have a BIG TIME LT who proves it week in and out and a solid RT again give us a real QB and see what happens

2012 NFL Mock Draft: Full First-Round Predictions | Bleacher Report (http://bleacherreport.com/articles/946290-2012-nfl-mock-draft-full-first-round-predictions/page/10)

"My opinion on Baylor's Robert Griffin III is very fluid, one week I have him in the top ten and the next he is out of the first round. One thing I know is that Griffin III is a terrific athlete who is showing that he is capable of playing quarterback at the next level.

The concerns I have mainly surround his style of play and limited experience in a pro-style offense. Baylor employs a wide open spread attack, which doesn't allow Griffin III to make many reads. Most of his reads are made pre-snap or to one side of the field. The NFL is all about reading defenses and making good decisions.

Griffin III will likely be a first round selection, mainly due to his potential. The Washington Redskins are in desperate need of an answer at the quarterback position. Mike Shanahan is known as an offensive guru, making Griffin III an intriguing addition."

I keep seeing people saying we need to address the O-line. I think our starting Oline is pretty solid. Maybe we need one more piece to the puzzle, but

T. Williams
K. Lich
Montgomery
Chester
Brown

I think they are doing a solid job this year till a few got hurt, and our depth seems okay. I would maybe work to get a stronger RT but that's it.

brown is awful, chester isn't good, the other three are okay. its a below average line. outside of trent, most of those guys would be backups on 20 other teams.

brown is awful, chester isn't good, the other three are okay. its a below average line. outside of trent, most of those guys would be backups on 20 other teams.

I think Lich would start on most teams, but only him and williams.

problem with lich is keepin him healthy

brown is awful, chester isn't good, the other three are okay. its a below average line. outside of trent, most of those guys would be backups on 20 other teams.
Except New Orleans and Baltimore.

Those teams never make the playoffs, in fact the thought of Brown and Chester starting a playoff game is ridiculous right? :thumb:

The solution is Tannehill, Keenum, or Moore and a mid round QB like Persa, etc in rounds 3-5. I am having flashbacks to 1994 when we got Shuler then Frerotte. Shuler sucked, and we brought in Frerotte to salvage something, and had a young Trent Green as backup. IF Tannehill doesn't pan out, a Dan Persa, or another starting QB of less reknown could be serviceable if not surprise us and be a Flacco. To be honest, I think we really get too much into the hype about QBs. Being a stud in NCAA Div I doesn't mean anything in the pros. How does a Heath Shuler or Ryan Leaf totally suck and a guy like Tom Brady become a stud? RG III could be a very good qb or he could suck in the pros. Same goes for Luck. Cam Newton and to a lesser extent Sam Bradford somewhat lived up to the hype, but for every one of those guys there are a dozen Joey Harringtons and Patrick Ramseys. No matter who we pick first, it is still a gamble.

Luck and Barkley are playing great, RGIII played briefly and the team scored 66 pts. mainly without him, interesting?

Barkley is just a flat out stud, love that kid and would to see him in Burgundy and Gold.

I'd take any of the 3 and pray We will

I couldn't believe it when I heard that Matt Barkley threw 6 TD's against UCLA...you know, he could be better than Luck

I couldn't believe it when I heard that Matt Barkley threw 6 TD's against UCLA...you know, he could be better than Luck

He has quietly being having a great season. I would say he's almost as good due to his physical build. Both will be great pros, I take either one.