mlmpetert
11-18-2011, 12:05 PM
Sanchez has shown poise in the pocket, shown he can roll out and pass the ball on the move, and shown he can run for the 1st down if he needs to. This is a bad year for him which I'm not sure if it's the OL or what.
Every year has been a bad year for him, despite all the talen around him. I think hes the most overrated QB in the nfl.
SFREDSKIN
11-18-2011, 01:18 PM
I would say Bradford follow by Sanchez. Most people would say Cutler to me he has a gunslinger and gambler mentality which I don't like.
celts32
11-18-2011, 01:19 PM
Every year has been a bad year for him, despite all the talen around him. I think hes the most overrated QB in the nfl.
This is sort of true...if it were not for the playoff wins he would be approaching bust category. He has had some nice playoff performances which earns him a free pass with a lot of people but his regular seasons have not been good for the most part.
Lotus
11-18-2011, 01:23 PM
Shanny did hand-pick Cutler but I think he also would have hand-picked Bradford if he could have. So I say Bradford.
SBXVII
11-18-2011, 02:18 PM
Ok then some one refresh my memory....
Didn't Denver and Chicago trade QB's because they were not happy with their performances? ie; too many INT's, Fumbles, not scoring. and wasn't Cutler apart of that trade? To me.... his stats are only slightly better then Grossmans.
Ok then some one refresh my memory....
Didn't Denver and Chicago trade QB's because they were not happy with their performances? ie; too many INT's, Fumbles, not scoring. and wasn't Cutler apart of that trade? To me.... his stats are only slightly better then Grossmans.
Only slightly? I think you need to get some glasses.
If you want someone that compares to Grossman put his numbers next to Sanchez.
skinsfaninok
11-18-2011, 02:28 PM
Bradford then Cutler... Sanchez? Thank god we didn't get him
mlmpetert
11-18-2011, 03:02 PM
Bradford then Cutler... Sanchez? Thank god we didn't get him
Sanchez is the Devin Thomas of quarterbacks. Imagine if we had him.... if you thnk fan morale is bad now!
celts32
11-18-2011, 03:04 PM
Ok then some one refresh my memory....
Didn't Denver and Chicago trade QB's because they were not happy with their performances? ie; too many INT's, Fumbles, not scoring. and wasn't Cutler apart of that trade? To me.... his stats are only slightly better then Grossmans.
No not true at all...Denver traded Cutler because Cutler and McDaniels did not hit it off. Cutler did not want to play for McDaniels and finally Pat Bowlen got fed up and traded him. It had nothing to do with performance...
SBXVII
11-18-2011, 03:09 PM
No not true at all...Denver traded Cutler because Cutler and McDaniels did not hit it off. Cutler did not want to play for McDaniels and finally Pat Bowlen got fed up and traded him. It had nothing to do with performance...
LOL.... I don't know why I thought of Viagra. LOL.
Ok, I'm wrong. I don't know enough about Cutler other then he was traded and I do recall a difference between the HC and QB, but I thought it was centered around the QB not playing well in the system.