Alvin Walton
11-09-2011, 12:09 PM
Hot lunches in the school cafeteria only.
Another fine socialist program.
:Flush:
Chicago School Bans Kids from Bringing Lunches from Home (http://blog.heritage.org/2011/04/11/parents-cant-pack-lunches-in-obamas-chicagoland/)
Big Brother knows best........
That Guy
11-09-2011, 03:10 PM
I think there are bigger things to worry about... and I doubt this is really all that hard to bypass if you want to get around it.
They best way to figure out if new ideas are good or stupid is to test them. the good ones spread to nearby counties and the bad ideas get revoked and go away.
I think school uniforms are stupid, but their effect on grades seems to be significant.
over the mountain
11-10-2011, 04:03 PM
i want to try and guess the public policy reason . . .
1) some kids have good things to eat in their bag like rice krispie treats, sandwhiches, snack packs and capri suns while other less provided for kids have pbj, hard thick slices of govt cheese and have to drink out of the water foutain
or
2) whatever political shot caller who proposed this law is getting paid under the table by whatever private company provides or makes the school cafeteria food ...
edit - dang it. i should have known, "its for the better of the children" thingy. although i believe my option 2 is still in play as a scandal takes time to be discovered.
that baltimore thing about an extra tax on soda is some BS, yeah baltimore put an extra tax on soda to help curb people buying soda and not b/c the city is in financial hell b/c of the lucrative insanely stupid deals they made with public servants unions re. pensions and all the people needing assistance . . .
Slingin Sammy 33
11-10-2011, 04:21 PM
i want to try and guess the public policy reason . . .
1) some kids have good things to eat in their bag like rice krispie treats, sandwhiches, snack packs and capri suns while other less provided for kids have pbj, hard thick slices of govt cheese and have to drink out of the water foutain
or
2) whatever political shot caller who proposed this law is getting paid under the table by whatever private company provides or makes the school cafeteria food ...You're close. This "healthy eating" BS is just a cover for increasing the federal funding the school receives based on the potential increase of free & reduced lunch vouchers.
But reporters Monica Eng and Joel Hood suggest there are other reasons than a nutrition crusade: "Any school that bans homemade lunches also puts more money in the pockets of the district's food provider, Chartwells-Thompson. The federal government pays the district for each free or reduced-price lunch taken, and the caterer receives a set fee from the district per lunch."
Read more: Michelle Obama's America: Chicago School Bans Bag Lunches to Protect Kids from Themselves | NewsBusters.org (http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2011/04/11/michelle-obamas-america-chicago-school-bans-bag-lunches-protect-kids-the#ixzz1dL62rEmx)
over the mountain
11-10-2011, 04:38 PM
sadly everything remotely related to politics is all about money.
that was a fun game though. read some headline then try and guess the warped "alleged" social policy behind it . .
"No flags allowed to be displayed on flag day"
"Fed ban on sale of tobacco to persons dying of terminal cancer"
"schools exploiting 'no child left behind act' loopholes"
"house republicans demand better healthcare . . .for fed employees"
"Detriot is losing residents, raises housing tax to make up budget gap"
"cheese manufacturers now not required to use any diary products . .whatsoever"
"school district cancels music"
Should be no problem funding it? Just steal it from the SS fund and deny a few life saving procedures to Seniors (Toooo Old) with the New Health care plan.......
firstdown
11-11-2011, 10:16 AM
i want to try and guess the public policy reason . . .
1) some kids have good things to eat in their bag like rice krispie treats, sandwhiches, snack packs and capri suns while other less provided for kids have pbj, hard thick slices of govt cheese and have to drink out of the water foutain
or
2) whatever political shot caller who proposed this law is getting paid under the table by whatever private company provides or makes the school cafeteria food ...
edit - dang it. i should have known, "its for the better of the children" thingy. although i believe my option 2 is still in play as a scandal takes time to be discovered.
that baltimore thing about an extra tax on soda is some BS, yeah baltimore put an extra tax on soda to help curb people buying soda and not b/c the city is in financial hell b/c of the lucrative insanely stupid deals they made with public servants unions re. pensions and all the people needing assistance . . .
Hey I love a good PBJ. The question is crunchy or smooth?
firstdown
11-14-2011, 10:33 AM
The problem is not the food it the lack of exercise that we don't get. My grandmothers generation ate a ton of high fat salty foods but they got plenty of exercise doing everyday chores. I can remember getting up in the morning to eggs, bacon, biscuts, and grits. Lunch was a couple of hot dogs or a hamburger. Then dinner was fried chicken, mash potatoes, gravy, rolls, beans etc...and they ate like that every day.
BringBackJoeT
11-14-2011, 11:10 AM
I think the ACLU successfully sued a school district over a similar policy a few years ago. Pretty sure it was in Indiana.