Sex Abuse Scandal Rocks Penn State

This is another case I support the death penalty for. Then again, being in jail as a child molester will be much more torture.

He'd immediately request solitary. The other prisoners would beat his brains in before he could set foot in the door.

Charity says cut ties with accused football coach - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/charity-says-severed-ties-accused-coach-2008-163413735.html)

This sick mother ****er met his victims from the very charity he started to "help troubled boys." **** yes this guy should die and it should be public. I say shoot him, then hang him, then tattoo them, then kill him!!!


E88HEuwInno

This is another case I support the death penalty for. Then again, being in jail as a child molester will be much more torture.

As bad as this sounds, what if the guy actually enjoys getting d in the a? We already know he gave a 10 year old kid oral, so there's no telling if he might enjoy taking it up the butt too. That's why I said there's just no justice possible whatsoever, because nothing you could do to this dude would bring any relief whatsoever to these kids who have been scarred by him.

Lavar Arrington's thoughts (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/hard-hits/post/jerry-sandusky-news-shocking-to-this-former-player/2011/11/07/gIQAO7oVvM_blog.html) on the subject.

I will not argue that Paterno isn't culpable in this, although I think there's a human element to this story that's being obscured. Let's start with looking at Lavar's comments about his former coach Sandusky in the Washington Post (reprinted in the ESPN.com story):

"I'm perplexed as to how someone who did so much good could end up being accused of something so bad. I have my own kids, and I know how strongly I feel about them and protecting them from hurt, harm and danger. Selfishly I hope that Jerry is innocent, but if he isn't, as a parent my thought is may God show mercy on him ... On one side I want Jerry to be innocent because he was a great man to me, but on the other side, as a responsible parent if he did molest or assault those children, then he needs to be responsible for his actions, as we all have to be."

So while we are painting Sandusky as a monster - fairly - remember that even the most evil man is complex. Never more so than here. People who knew Sandusky loved him, described him as a great person and teacher, and a brilliant football mind. That all but the latter are now coming undone doesn't change the fact that he obviously had very good qualities, which I think Lavar's quote captures. My point not being to humanize someone guilty of the inhuman, but to help us to understand how Paterno would, in what was clearly in retrospect bad judgment, not rush to vigilantism against one of his oldest and most trusted colleagues. He was presented with this information and told the AD. He probably hoped it wasn't true. Jerry couldn't be guilty of that? No way, I know him.

A couple of years ago a friend of mine was accused of a monstrous sex crime. I didn't believe it. How could I? This was someone I knew, had driven across the country with, confessed my deepest thoughts to. I was not in a position to report his behavior to police but I can tell you that I wouldn't have, not because I would have wanted to protect him, but because I couldn't at that time bring myself to believe that someone I knew that well could be guilty of such a crime. Well guilty he was.

We live in a cynical age in which our most trusted leaders and public figures almost always break our hearts. They lie. They cheat. They steal. They fall short, again and again. You see that cynicism here and in other discussions: Paterno knows more than he's letting on goes the charge. Maybe, and if so I won't defend him. But isn't it possible that he didn't believe that this could be true about Jerry? That he did what was legally required of him (no debate there) but no more given the circumstances? And if so, does it really undo five decades of work in which he touched thousands of lives in a positive way?

I don't know. I know people are angry and want retribution. Maybe I am falling into that same trap ... I just can't believe that about Joe.

As bad as this sounds, what if the guy actually enjoys getting d in the a? We already know he gave a 10 year old kid oral, so there's no telling if he might enjoy taking it up the butt too. That's why I said there's just no justice possible whatsoever, because nothing you could do to this dude would bring any relief whatsoever to these kids who have been scarred by him.

They don't bend you over in jail if you're a child molester, they kill you.

Child molester/rapists that don't ask immediately for administrative segregation is ASKING for a death sentence. Prisoners want nothing to do with rapists and child molesters.

They don't bend you over in jail if you're a child molester, they kill you.

Child molester/rapists that don't ask immediately for administrative segregation is ASKING for a death sentence. Prisoners want nothing to do with rapists and child molesters.

Ah, I always assumed the rapists were the ones getting raped in jail, but death is a welcome alternative to that.

Well, he knew about the allegations, and all he did was mention it to the AD. He certainly didn't do all he could, that's for damn sure. There's plenty of blame to go around here, and a portion of it falls on Joe Pa's shoulders.

Joe Pa deserves a ton of blame.

Cant believe Joe Pa defense is gonna be "i reported it" to the AD like he did the right thing.

Sorry, but Joe Pa is a scumbag and everyone knows the AD worked for him and not he worked for the AD.

The obvious right thing to do is call the authorities, I hope this taints Joe Pa so called legacy, Ive lost all respect for the man.

I hope Penn St gets sued so bad the program folds, most over rated football program in the land anyways.

I will not argue that Paterno isn't culpable in this, although I think there's a human element to this story that's being obscured. Let's start with looking at Lavar's comments about his former coach Sandusky in the Washington Post (reprinted in the ESPN.com story):

"I'm perplexed as to how someone who did so much good could end up being accused of something so bad. I have my own kids, and I know how strongly I feel about them and protecting them from hurt, harm and danger. Selfishly I hope that Jerry is innocent, but if he isn't, as a parent my thought is may God show mercy on him ... On one side I want Jerry to be innocent because he was a great man to me, but on the other side, as a responsible parent if he did molest or assault those children, then he needs to be responsible for his actions, as we all have to be."

So while we are painting Sandusky as a monster - fairly - remember that even the most evil man is complex. Never more so than here. People who knew Sandusky loved him, described him as a great person and teacher, and a brilliant football mind. That all but the latter are now coming undone doesn't change the fact that he obviously had very good qualities, which I think Lavar's quote captures. My point not being to humanize someone guilty of the inhuman, but to help us to understand how Paterno would, in what was clearly in retrospect bad judgment, not rush to vigilantism against one of his oldest and most trusted colleagues. He was presented with this information and told the AD. He probably hoped it wasn't true. Jerry couldn't be guilty of that? No way, I know him.

A couple of years ago a friend of mine was accused of a monstrous sex crime. I didn't believe it. How could I? This was someone I knew, had driven across the country with, confessed my deepest thoughts to. I was not in a position to report his behavior to police but I can tell you that I wouldn't have, not because I would have wanted to protect him, but because I couldn't at that time bring myself to believe that someone I knew that well could be guilty of such a crime. Well guilty he was.

We live in a cynical age in which our most trusted leaders and public figures almost always break our hearts. They lie. They cheat. They steal. They fall short, again and again. You see that cynicism here and in other discussions: Paterno knows more than he's letting on goes the charge. Maybe, and if so I won't defend him. But isn't it possible that he didn't believe that this could be true about Jerry? That he did what was legally required of him (no debate there) but no more given the circumstances? And if so, does it really undo five decades of work in which he touched thousands of lives in a positive way?

I don't know. I know people are angry and want retribution. Maybe I am falling into that same trap ... I just can't believe that about Joe.

Sorry dude this guy is a piece of trash, complete trash. The devil comes to us in many forms very rarely does he come as a monster, he used the good attributes you described about him to hide his true monstrous acts. Joe Pa was shown the devil and he choose to not bring him to justice and for that Joe Pa is guilt. Joe Pa has to be the most powerful man on that campus and he choose not to use that power to bring this devil out. For that I say FAWK YOU Joe Pa and for every kid that got molested after Joe Pa knew of this and said nothing I give Joe PA a DOUBLE FAWK YOU! Rot in hell you old piece of shit and everyone else wrapped up in this.

There was a Sandusky in Baltimore that reports sports (don't know if he still does), anyone know if he is any relation? Just curious.