49ers vs. Redskins Game Day Thread

we just have to commit to the run. not that we will win but i think it gives us atleast a chance stay in games . . . cant believe how quickly we give up on the run.

You know before the game I was listening to 980am's pre game show while I was in the gym... Chris Russell came on and said he had it on authority from one the "highest ranking Redskin officials" that the team was drooling over Helu's potential in the screen game. So Kevin Sheehan's response was like- "don't give away the game plan, Chris." to which Russell sort of stammered and had no answer.

And then we have 14 completions to a RB... Curious. I guess we had the lack of a run game planned all along, and released as much to the media before the game??? I dunno....

^ exactly like I said earlier Ben, romo, Arod, Cutler all have avg OL and they put up big numbers

Just a random thought, I really think moving Montgomery to guard was a bad idea. Glad to see him back at center again.

I wish we could get a coaching staff that does this. It seems that the past couple of years we have coaches that have a scheme and stick to that scheme regardless whether the players fit it or not.

I'm actually thinking that our thought processes are ass backwards. I've argued as well as anyone that coach's need to develope players and need to utilize the talent they have on this team or rather make the scheme work around the talent on the team.

But maybe, just maybe, we are all wrong and it's more about keeping the coaching staff around long enough to get the personel on this team that fits the scheme. .... and consistancy, meaning keeping a coaching staff around longer then 2 yrs, getting a top notch QB and or developing a top notch QB and allowing him to develope, vs. switching QB's every few yrs for something greener in the next pastur that doesn't work out.

You know before the game I was listening to 980am's pre game show while I was in the gym... Chris Russell came on and said he had it on authority from one the "highest ranking Redskin officials" that the team was drooling over Helu's potential in the screen game. So Kevin Sheehan's response was like- "don't give away the game plan, Chris." to which Russell sort of stammered and had no answer.

And then we have 14 completions to a RB... Curious. I guess we had the lack of a run game planned all along, and released as much to the media before the game??? I dunno....

yeah going to screens, dump offs and underneaths is pretty much an extension of the run game, it makes alot of sense if your O line is banged up or not getting a push.

i just cant believe how bad beck limits this offense. i dont think kyles scheme can be run without taking shots down field . .

in re to dalton, young etc . . .i dont think you get a qb just to get a qb. you have to get they right and perfect qb for your needs. it may take a few years for the stars to align.

you can date and fool around with runningbacks, etc but your married to a qb. coaches get fired or hoist the lombardi based off the qb they pick.

but next year, it seems shanny has to force is pick. we cant wait much longer. to bad, we tried to get bradford and rumored to have liked ponder before he got picked before us.

I'm actually thinking that our thought processes are ass backwards. I've argued as well as anyone that coach's need to develope players and need to utilize the talent they have on this team or rather make the scheme work around the talent on the team.

But maybe, just maybe, we are all wrong and it's more about keeping the coaching staff around long enough to get the personel on this team that fits the scheme. .... and consistancy, meaning keeping a coaching staff around longer then 2 yrs, getting a top notch QB and or developing a top notch QB and allowing him to develope, vs. switching QB's every few yrs for something greener in the next pastur that doesn't work out.

I'm fine with this if MS had started to rebuild the offense since day one instead of bringing a washed up McNabb last year.

I'm fine with this if MS had started to rebuild the offense since day one instead of bringing a washed up McNabb last year.

Well, he has started the process this year, and we'd be fools to abort the project simply because he didn't implement it soon enough. Better late then never.

You know before the game I was listening to 980am's pre game show while I was in the gym... Chris Russell came on and said he had it on authority from one the "highest ranking Redskin officials" that the team was drooling over Helu's potential in the screen game. So Kevin Sheehan's response was like- "don't give away the game plan, Chris." to which Russell sort of stammered and had no answer.

And then we have 14 completions to a RB... Curious. I guess we had the lack of a run game planned all along, and released as much to the media before the game??? I dunno....

If you listened to Shanny's press conference after the game, you'd find out exactly why they were dinking and dunking. It was the type of defense that the 49ers were running.

I'm fine with this if MS had started to rebuild the offense since day one instead of bringing a washed up McNabb last year.

mcnabb was on pace to set the skins single season passing yard record and gave us big play capabilities . . . just wish he could have been more amenable to instruction . .

mcnabb was on pace to set the skins single season passing yard record and gave us big play capabilities . . . just wish he could have been more amenable to instruction . .

Yards don't win games. Scoring points does. McNabb was horrible on 3rd down conversion and killed drives on a regular with his inconsistency. The fact that a rookie is running the Vikings offense better than McDummy says everything you need to know.